Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents - 18/08/11
, Tricia Soliz, RN, MSN b, Cameron Crandall, MD a, Greg Hendey, MD b, James Andrews, MD b, Lori Weichenthal, MD bAbstract |
We sought to compare the efficacy of 3 intravenous antiemetic medications in ED patients complaining of moderate to severe nausea. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial compares 1.25 mg droperidol, 10 mg metoclopramide, 10 mg prochlorperazine, and saline placebo. Adult ED patients complaining of nausea were eligible. Nausea was measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale at 0 and 30 minutes after treatment. A convenience sample of 100 patients was enrolled; 97 had complete data available for analysis. Of these, 22 patients received droperidol, 25 received metoclopramide, 24 received prochlorperazine, and 26 received placebo. Droperidol (−54.5 mm) was significantly better than metoclopramide (−40.2 mm) or prochlorperazine (−40.5 mm) at reducing nausea at 30 minutes (P = .04). There were no significant differences in rescue medication or patient satisfaction; however, droperidol had significantly higher akathisia (71.4% vs 23.5%) at 24-hour follow-up. When administered intravenously to adult patients with moderate to severe nausea, droperidol was more effective than metoclopramide or prochlorperazine but caused more extrapyramidal symptoms. Metoclopramide and prochlorperazine were not more effective than saline placebo. All patients improved over time and possibly with intravenous hydration.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | The abstract of this paper was presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meetings in San Francisco in May 2000 and St Louis in May 2002. |
| ☆☆ | This study has no outside sources of support. |
Vol 24 - N° 2
P. 177-182 - mars 2006 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
