Control of multiply resistant cocci: do international comparisons help? - 02/09/11
: Clinical epidemiologist and research scientist, Werner Albrich b, d : Medical resident, Donald A Goldmann a, d : Hospital epidemiologist and professor of paediatrics, Johannes Huebner c, d : Principal investigator and an instructor in medicineSummary |
Antibiotic resistance has become a worldwide problem. However, the reasons for the uneven geographic distribution of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms are not fully understood. For instance, there are striking differences in the epidemiology of multiresistant Gram-positive cocci between the USA and Germany. According to recent reports, the prevalence of high-level penicillinresistant pneumococci (PRP), meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in clinically relevant isolates of hospitalised patients in the USA and Germany are: PRP, 14% versus less than 1%; MRSA, 36% versus 15%; and VRE, 15% versus 1%. These disparities may be explained by several determinants: (1) diagnostic practice and laboratory recognition (all three pathogens); (2) clonal differences and pathogen transmissibility (VRE); (3) antibiotic prescribing practices (all three pathogens); (4) population characteristics, including extensive daycare exposure in the USA (PRP); (5) cultural factors (all three pathogens); (6) factors related to the health-care and legal system (all three pathogens); and (7) infectioncontrol practices (MRSA and VRE). Understanding these determinants is important for preventing further spread of multiresistant cocci within the USA. A rational approach to national surveillance is urgently needed in Germany to preserve the favourable situation and decrease MRSA transmission. Finally, we suggest that a macro-level perspective on antibiotic resistance can broaden the understanding of this worldwide calamity, and help prevent further dissemination of multiply resistant microorganisms.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 1 - N° 4
P. 251-261 - novembre 2001 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
