Cytidine diphosphate choline improves the outcome of cardiac arrest vs epinephrine in rat model - 09/07/13
, Zhan Lei, MD bAbstract |
Objectives |
Cytidine diphosphate choline (CDP-choline) is a cholinergic agent that can both stimulate the cholinergic pathway and increase blood pressure. We aimed to investigate the effects of CDP-choline on the outcome of cardiac arrest in comparison with epinephrine.
Methods |
This was a randomized prospective animal study. Cardiac arrest was induced by asphyxia in 45 rats. After 7 minutes of asphyxia, resuscitation was attempted. The rats were allocated to different groups treated with 2 mL/kg saline, 100 μg/kg epinephrine, or 250 mg/kg CDP-choline. The hemodynamic parameters were monitored for 2 hours after resuscitation, and cardiac function was evaluated by echocardiography 2 hours after resuscitation. The hearts were harvested at the end of monitoring for histologic evaluation.
Results |
Epinephrine and CDP-choline improved the rate of return of spontaneous circulation and blood pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; however, postresuscitation cardiac function in the CDP-choline and placebo groups was better than in the epinephrine group. Compared with the epinephrine group, less myocardial and mitochondrial injury was observed by electron microscopy in the CDP-choline and placebo groups; the level of superoxide dismutase and malondialdehyde indicated less peroxidative injury in the CDP-choline and placebo groups. Cytidine diphosphate choline and placebo also preserved connexin 43 when compared with epinephrine.
Conclusion |
When administered during resuscitation, CDP-choline increased the rate of return of spontaneous circulation similarly to epinephrine. In addition, it did not increase the severity of myocardial injury and postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction, whereas epinephrine appeared to be harmful.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | Sources of funding: The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81071539). |
Vol 31 - N° 7
P. 1022-1028 - juillet 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
