Factors associated with successful second and third intubation attempts in the ED - 09/09/13
, Hyuk Joong Choi, MD, PhD b, Sang Mo Je, MD c, Euichung Kim, MD con behalf of the Korean Emergency Airway Management Registry (KEAMR) Investigators
Abstract |
Purpose |
The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with successful second and third attempts in adults following a failed first intubation attempt in the emergency department (ED).
Methods |
This was a retrospective analysis of the data from a multicenter, prospective, observational airway registry in South Korea. We obtained demographic and clinical data of intubated adult patients in 6 academic EDs from January 2007 to December 2010. The primary outcome was successful rescue attempt, which was defined as the successful placement of an endotracheal tube following a failed first intubation attempt. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to develop a multivariate model identifying factors associated with successful second and third attempts.
Results |
Of 5905 adult patients, 1122 (19.0%) failed a first intubation attempt. The success rates of the second and third attempts were 79.2% and 78.5%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors associated with a successful second attempt were emergency physicians, senior physicians, nondifficult airway, and the use of a rapid sequence intubation (RSI) (odds ratio = 2.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.80-4.37], 1.50 [1.10-2.07], 2.15 [1.53-3.01], and 1.53 [1.01-2.33], respectively). Nondifficult airway and the use of RSI were associated with successful third attempts (5.48 [2.69-11.18] and 2.63 [1.08-6.40], respectively).
Conclusions |
Nondifficult airway and the use of RSI were associated with successful second and third intubation attempts. The use of RSI, backup by experienced senior physicians, and preparation for management of a difficult airway could be strategies for successful rescue intubation attempts in the ED.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | Author contributions: All Korean Emergency Airway Management Registry investigators designed and conducted the registry project. YMK conceived and designed the study. JHK, SMJ, ECK, and HJC conducted data collection and managed the data, including quality control. JHK, YMK, and HJC analyzed the data and interpreted the results. JHK drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. YMK takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
| ☆☆ | The Catholic University of Korea Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation supported manuscript translation. |
Vol 31 - N° 9
P. 1376-1381 - septembre 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
