Are we closing the gap in faculty development needs for feedback training? - 04/12/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.05.005

John D. Mitchell, MD ^a,^b,^{^⁎} : Assistant Professor of Anaesthesia, Elena J. Holak, MD, PharmD ^c : Professor of Anesthesiology, H. Nicole Tran, MD, PhD ^d : Internist, Sharon Muret-Wagstaff, PhD, MPA ^a,^b : Assistant Professor of Anaesthesia, Stephanie B. Jones, MD ^a,^b : Associate Professor of Anaesthesia, Marek Brzezinski, MD, PhD ^e : Associate Professor of Anesthesia
^a Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
^b Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
^c Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
^d Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA 94611, USA
^e Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

^⁎Correspondence: John D. Mitchell, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Rd., CC-470, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Abstract

Study Objective

To determine needs, adequacy, types of resources, and challenges in teaching faculty how to provide feedback to residents.

Design

Survey instrument.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Participants

Of the 115 anesthesia residency program directors surveyed, 69 responses were received (60% response rate).

Measurements

Percentages of respondents who indicated categories of need, adequacy, and types of resources for teaching faculty to give feedback to residents were recorded, as were narrative descriptions of challenges confronted by respondents.

Main Results

While the percentage of programs with faculty development resources has increased from 20.2% in 1999 to 48% today, an overwhelming majority of program directors (90%) feel that faculty require more training in providing feedback to residents. The majority of program directors also want more resources to train their faculty in providing feedback.

Conclusions

While the perceived gap in providing training for faculty in giving feedback to anesthesia residents has narrowed, program director responses suggest a substantial unmet need remains. Innovative new approaches are in order.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Anesthesia, education, Anesthesiologists, Feedback, Resources, Survey

Plan

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

☆	Supported by a Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Rabkin Fellowship in Medical Education and the John Hedley-Whyte Award from the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Export

Vol 25 - N° 7

P. 560-564 - novembre 2013 Retour au numéro

Article précédent

Incidence and predictors of postdischarge nausea and vomiting in a 7-day population
Jan Odom-Forren, Leena Jalota, Debra K. Moser, Terry A. Lennie, Lynne A. Hall, Joseph Holtman, Vallire Hooper, Christian C. Apfel

| Article suivant

Some epidurographic explanations for incomplete epidural analgesia coverage in the absence of a catheter
Eman M.S. Nada, Mehmet Alparslan Turan, Mona N. Mohamed

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

connectez-vous ou créez un compte

Are we closing the gap in faculty development needs for feedback training? - 04/12/13

Abstract

Study Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Measurements

Main Results

Conclusions

Plan

Export citations

Fichier

Contenu

Accès rapides

Mon compte

Aide & support

Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL