Setting wait times to achieve targeted left-without-being-seen rates - 29/03/14
Abstract |
Background |
Although several studies have demonstrated that wait time is a key factor that drives high leave-without-being-seen (LWBS) rates, limited data on ideal wait times and impact on LWBS rates exist.
Study Objectives |
We studied the LWBS rates by triage class and target wait times required to achieve various LWBS rates.
Methods |
We conducted a 3-year retrospective analysis of patients presenting to an urban, tertiary, academic, adult emergency department (ED). We divided the 3-year study period into 504 discrete periods by year, day of the week, and hour of the day. Patients of same triage level arriving in the same bin were exposed to similar ED conditions. For each bin, we calculate the mean actual wait time and the proportion of patients that abandoned. We performed a regression analysis on the abandonment proportion on the mean wait time using weighted least squares regression.
Results |
A total of 143 698 patients were included for analysis during the study period. The R2 value was highest for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 3 (R2 = 0.88), suggesting that wait time is the major factor driving LWBS of ESI 3 patients. Assuming that ESI 2 patients wait less than 10 minutes, our sensitivity analysis shows that the target wait times for ESI 3 and ESI 4/5 patients should be less than 45 and 60 minutes, respectively, to achieve an overall LWBS rate of less than 2%.
Conclusion |
Achieving target LWBS rates requires analysis to understand the abandonment behavior and redesigning operations to achieve the target wait times.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | Author contribution: OAS and RJB conceived the study and designed the trial. OAS supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. RJB undertook data abstraction; managed the data, including quality control; and analyzed the data. OAS and JL drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. OAS takes responsibility for the manuscript as a whole. |
| ☆☆ | Prior presentations: None. |
| ★ | Financial support: None. |
Vol 32 - N° 4
P. 342-345 - avril 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Thirty and ninety days mortality predictive value of admission and in-hospital procalcitonin and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin testing in patients with dyspnea. Results from the VERyfing DYspnea trial
- Francesco Travaglino, Veronica Russo, Benedetta De Berardinis, Filippo Numeroso, Pamela Catania, Gianfranco Cervellin, Stefano Geniere Nigra, Francesco Geraci, Maria Antonietta Bressan, Stefania Guerrini, Mario Cavazza, Christian Folli, Valter Monzani, Stefania Battista, Giulio Mengozzi, Paola Noto, Giuseppe Carpinteri, Andrea Semplicini, Federica Stella, Stella Ingrassia, Paolo Moscatelli, Patrizia Giuntini, Gerardo Salerno, Patrizia Cardelli, Salvatore Di Somma
- Ultrasound evaluation of appendicitis: importance of the 3 × 2 table for outcome reporting
- Martin Fedko, Venkatesh R. Bellamkonda, M. Fernanda Bellolio, Erik P. Hess, Christine M. Lohse, Torrey A. Laack, Michael J. Laughlin, Ronna L. Campbell
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?