S'abonner

The association between headache and elevated blood pressure among patients presenting to an ED - 06/09/14

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.017 
Benjamin W. Friedman, MD, MS , Binoy Mistry, MD, Jason R. West, MD, Andrew Wollowitz, MD
 Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA 
 Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467. Tel.: +1 718 920 6626.

Abstract

Background

Elevated blood pressure (BP) and headache have long been linked in the medical literature, although data on association are conflicting. We used previously collected data to address these related aims: (1) using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), we determined whether elevated BP is more likely in patients who present to an emergency department (ED) with headache than in patients who present with other complaints; (2) using data collected in 3 ED-based migraine clinical trials, we determined the association between improvement in headache pain and improvement in BP among patients who present to an ED with migraine and elevated BP; (3) using the data from the migraine clinical trials, we also determined if an elevated baseline BP identifies a group of patients less likely to respond to standard migraine treatment.

Methods

We analyzed 2 distinct data sets. The first, NHAMCS, is a national probability sample of all US ED visits. The second is a compilation of data gathered during 3 ED-based migraine randomized controlled trials. We defined elevated BP as follows: moderate elevation—systolic BP (SBP) ≥150 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥95 mm Hg; marked elevation—SBP ≥165 mm Hg or DBP ≥100 mm Hg; and severe elevation—SBP ≥180 mm Hg or DBP ≥110 mm Hg. We report the association between headache and elevated BP in NHAMCS using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We report the correlation coefficient and r2 for the association between improvement in BP and improvement in headache pain in our clinical trials data set. Finally, using our clinical trials database, we determined the influence of elevated BP at baseline on response to migraine medication by constructing a linear regression model in which the dependent variable was improvement in 0 to 10 pain score between baseline and 1 hour, and the primary predictor variable was presence or absence of elevated BP at baseline.

Results

Headache was the primary complaint in 3.7% (95% CI, 3.4-4.0%) of all US ED visits, corresponding to 4.8 million (95% CI, 4.2-5.4 million) patient visits. Among US ED patients, those with headache were more likely than patients with other chief complaints to have markedly (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.61) or severely elevated BP (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.17-1.90). In our clinical trials data set of patients with migraine with moderately elevated BP, there was no correlation between improvement in pain score and improvement in SBP (r = −0.07, r2 = 0, P = .465) or DBP (r = −0.03, r2 = 0, P = .75). Similarly, there was no correlation between improvement in headache and improvement in BP among patients with migraine with markedly elevated BP (for SBP, r = −0.19, r2 = 0.04, P = .89; for DBP, r = −0.02, r2 = 0, P = .87), nor among patients with severely elevated BP (for SBP, r = 0.06, r2 = 0, P = .81; for DBP, r = 0.03, r2 = 0, P = .90). Patients with moderately elevated BP had slightly less improvement in their 0 to 10 pain score than patients with BPs below this cutoff (−0.6; 95% CI, −1.2 to −0.1; P = .03). This was more pronounced among patients with markedly elevated BP (−0.9; 95% CI, −1.7 to −0.2).

Conclusions

Although there is an association between elevated BP and headache among patients presenting to an ED, improvement in headache is not associated with improvement in BP.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Meetings at which this work has been presented: Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2013.
☆☆ Grant support: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None.
★★ Author contributions: BWF conceived and designed the study. BM, JRW, and AW abstracted data and reviewed the literature. BWF analyzed the data. BWF drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. BWF takes responsibility for the article as a whole.


© 2014  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 32 - N° 9

P. 976-981 - septembre 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The prognostic factors of adult patients with hepatic portal venous gas in the ED
  • Chen-June Seak, Kuang-Hung Hsu, Yon-Cheong Wong, Chip-Jin Ng, David Hung-Tsang Yen, Joanna Chen-Yeen Seak, Chen-Ken Seak
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Arterial lactate improves the prognostic performance of severity score systems in septic patients in the ED
  • Yun-Xia Chen, Chun-Sheng Li

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.