The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation: 5% vs 3% hypertonic saline - 05/11/14
, Hassan Aziz, M.D., Margeaux Snell, M.D., Viraj Pandit, M.D., Daniel Hays, Pharm.D., Narong Kulvatunyou, M.D., Andrew Tang, M.D., Terence O’Keeffe, M.B.Ch.B., Julie Wynne, M.D., Randall S. Friese, M.D., Peter Rhee, M.D.Abstract |
Background |
Use of 5% normal saline (NS) is gaining renewed interest. The primary aim of our study was to compare the physiological effects after the administration of different concentrations of hypertonic saline (3% vs 5%NS) in the initial resuscitation of trauma.
Methods |
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all trauma patients who received hypertonic saline during initial resuscitation. Medical records were reviewed for serum electrolytes and serum osmolarity, coagulation parameters, complications, and mortality.
Results |
A total of 212 patients were included in the study, of which 170 patients received 5%NS and 42 patients received 3%NS. Both groups were similar in age (41.16 ± 19 vs 44.17 + 23.6; P = .45) and ISS score (26 [17 to 29] vs 25 [16 to 27]; P = .6). Mean serum osmolarity (316 ± 20.3 vs 294 ± 22.5; P = .02) and serum sodium levels (143 ± 8.6 vs 137 ± 10.9; P < .001) remained higher in the 5%NS group within 72 hours of admission. The pH was lower in the 5%NS group compared with the 3%NS group at 24 hours (7.29 ± .12 vs 7.33 ± .12; P = .01); however, at 48 and 72 hours (7.40 ± .07 vs 7.41 ± .07; P = .7), no difference was found. There was no difference in blood products requirement (1,734 vs 2,253 mL; P = .11) between the 2 groups.
Conclusions |
The 5%NS has sustained higher serum osmolarity and serum sodium concentration within the first 72 hours without any increase in adverse effects in comparison with 3%NS.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : 5% Normal saline, Hypertonic saline, Serum sodium, Complications, Physiological effects
Plan
| This article has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere. None of the authors have any financial disclosures. |
|
| B.J., D.H., T.K., R.S.F., and P.R. designed this study. B.J., H.A., M.S., V.P., A.T., and J.W. searched the literature. B.J., H.A., M.S., D.H., and V.P. collected the data. B.J., H.A., V.P., N.K., R.F., and P.R. analyzed the data. All other authors participated in data interpretation and manuscript preparation. |
Vol 208 - N° 5
P. 697-702 - novembre 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
