Cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis : Differential diagnosis, diagnosis, histopathology, and management - 12/11/15

Abstract |
The diagnosis of leishmaniasis can be challenging because it mimics both infectious and malignant conditions. A misdiagnosis may lead to an unfavorable outcome. Using culture, histologic, and/or polymerase chain reaction study results, a diagnosis of leishmaniasis can be established and treatment initiated. Appropriate management requires an accurate diagnosis, which often includes identification of the specific etiologic species. Different endemic areas have varying sensitivities to the same medication, even within individual species. Species identification may be of practical value, because infections with select species have a substantial risk of visceral involvement. In addition, HIV and otherwise immunocompromised patients with leishmaniasis have a propensity for diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis. For most New World Leishmania species, parenteral antimonial drugs remain the first line of therapy, while Old World species are easily treated with physical modalities. Historically, live organism vaccination has been used and is effective in preventing leishmaniasis, but results in an inoculation scar and an incubation period that may last for years. A more effective method of vaccination would be welcome.
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Key words : antimony, carbon dioxide slush, CDC, HIV, Leishmaniasis, ketoconazole, miltefosine, protozoa, sodium stibogluconate, tropical disease, vaccination, vaccine
Abbreviations used : CDC, HLA, NADPH, PCR, RFHT, RPMI
Mappa
| Funding sources: None. |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None declared. |
|
| Date of release: December 2015 |
|
| Expiration date: December 2018 |
Vol 73 - N° 6
P. 911-926 - dicembre 2015 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
