Abbonarsi

Comparative efficacy and incremental cost per responder of methotrexate versus apremilast for methotrexate-naïve patients with psoriasis - 18/09/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.05.040 
April W. Armstrong, MD, MPH a, Keith A. Betts, PhD b, , Murali Sundaram, PhD c, Darren Thomason, BS b, James E. Signorovitch, PhD b
a Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 
b Analysis Group Inc, Boston, Massachusetts 
c AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois 

Reprint requests: Keith A. Betts, PhD, Analysis Group Inc, 111 Huntington Ave, 14th Floor, Boston, MA 02199.Analysis Group Inc111 Huntington Ave, 14th FloorBostonMA02199

Abstract

Background

To our knowledge, no clinical trials directly compare apremilast with methotrexate (the standard of care for initial systemic treatment of psoriasis).

Objective

We sought to compare apremilast's relative efficacy with that of methotrexate for moderate to severe psoriasis.

Methods

An anchor-based indirect comparison was conducted for 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score from baseline to week 16 (PASI 75) rates for systemic-naïve patients from Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of apreMilast in psoriasis (ESTEEM) 1 and 2 (apremilast vs placebo) and Comparative study of HumirA vs. Methotrexate vs Placebo In psOriasis patieNts (CHAMPION) (adalimumab vs methotrexate vs placebo) trials. The difference-in-difference in PASI 75 response rates was calculated as the difference between the ESTEEM apremilast and placebo rates and the CHAMPION methotrexate versus placebo rates. Number needed to treat and incremental drug cost per responder were also estimated.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found between apremilast and methotrexate in PASI 75 (risk difference 13.1%; 95% confidence interval −1.8% to 28.0%; P = .09). Number needed to treat with apremilast versus methotrexate to gain 1 additional PASI 75 responder was 7.6. Annual incremental drug cost of this responder was estimated at $187,888.33.

Limitations

Few trials compare systemic-naïve patients. Only direct medication costs were considered.

Conclusions

There was no statistical evidence of greater efficacy for apremilast versus methotrexate. The $187,888 incremental cost per PASI 75 may exceed what payers are willing to pay.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : apremilast, cost per responder, cost-effectiveness, indirect comparison, methotrexate, moderate to severe psoriasis, number needed to treat, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index

Abbreviations used : AAD, CI, FDA, ICPR, IQWiG, NNT, PASI, PASI 75, RD


Mappa


 Funding for this study was provided by AbbVie. AbbVie participated in the interpretation of data, review, and approval of the manuscript.
 Disclosure: Dr Armstrong serves as investigator and/or consultant to AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Merck, Lilly, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, and Modernizing Medicine. Drs Betts and Signorovitch and Mr Thomason are employed by Analysis Group Inc, which received payment from AbbVie for participation in this research. Dr Sundaram is an employee of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or stock options.
 Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, San Francisco, CA, March 20-24, 2015.


© 2016  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 75 - N° 4

P. 740-746 - ottobre 2016 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The infliximab biosimilar in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis
  • Paolo Dapavo, Igor Vujic, Maria Teresa Fierro, Pietro Quaglino, Martina Sanlorenzo
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Increased risk of aortic aneurysm (AA) in relation to the severity of psoriasis: A national population-based matched-cohort study
  • Hsien-Yi Chiu, Po-Ching Lo, Weng-Foung Huang, Yi-Wen Tsai, Tsen-Fang Tsai

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.