Abbonarsi

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Use for Younger Patients with Breast Cancer Treated in Different Types of Cancer Centers Across the United States - 25/10/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.08.541 
Jahan J. Mohiuddin, MD a, Allison M. Deal, MS b, c, Lisa A. Carey, MD b, d, Jennifer L. Lund, PhD b, e, Brock R. Baker, MD a, Timothy M. Zagar, MD b, f, Ellen L. Jones, MD, PhD b, f, Lawrence B. Marks, MD b, f, Ronald C. Chen, MD, MPH b, f, g, ⁎
a School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 
b Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 
c Biostatistics Core Facility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 
d Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 
e Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 
f Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 
g Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 

∗Correspondence address: Ronald C Chen, MD, MPH, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, CB #7512, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina HospitalsCB #7512Chapel HillNC27599-7512

Abstract

Background

Multiple clinical trials have shown that neoadjuvant systemic therapy has a benefit in women who are borderline lumpectomy candidates and in those with locally advanced breast cancers by reducing the mastectomy rate and making inoperable tumors operable. The study aim was to examine the patterns of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy use among younger women in the United States treated at different types of cancer centers.

Study Design

Data from the National Cancer Data Base for 118,086 women younger than 65 years with clinical stage IIA (T2N0 only) to IIIC breast cancer. Following the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline categorization, patients were grouped into those who were borderline lumpectomy candidates (clinical stage IIA [T2N0 only], IIB, or IIIA [T3N1 only]) or those with locally advanced disease (clinical stage IIIA [T0-3N2 only], IIIB, or IIIC). The main outcome was the proportion of women who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Results

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ranged from 17% (stage IIA) to 79% (stage IIIB). Across almost all stage and receptor subtypes, the use was lower in community vs academic centers. On multivariable analysis, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was decreased in community vs academic centers (borderline lumpectomy candidates: adjusted risk ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69–0.77; locally advanced disease: adjusted risk ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74–0.83).

Conclusions

Use of guideline-concordant neoadjuvant chemotherapy is significantly higher among women treated at academic vs community centers in young and healthy women who do not commonly have contraindications to this treatment. Our study identified a potential disparity in cancer care by type of center where patients receive treatment.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations and Acronyms : aRR, AUC, NCCN, NCDB, pCR


Mappa


 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.
 Disclaimer: This study used the National Cancer Data Base. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors.


© 2016  American College of Surgeons. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 223 - N° 5

P. 717 - novembre 2016 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Radial Scar at Percutaneous Breast Biopsy That Does Not Require Surgery
  • Rachelle Y. Leong, Manpreet K. Kohli, Nebraz Zeizafoun, Amy Liang, Paul I. Tartter
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Comparing American Gastroenterological Association Pancreatic Cyst Management Guidelines with Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines as Predictors of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients with Suspected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms
  • Gene K. Ma, David S. Goldberg, Nikhil Thiruvengadam, Vinay Chandrasekhara, Michael L. Kochman, Gregory G. Ginsberg, Charles M. Vollmer, Nuzhat A. Ahmad

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.