Abbonarsi

Prospective validation of an initial cholecystectomy strategy for patients at intermediate-risk of common bile duct stone - 20/04/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.015 
Pouya Iranmanesh, MD 1, , Olivier Tobler, MD 1, Sandra De Sousa, MD 1, Jean-Louis Frossard, MD 2, 3, Philippe Morel, MD 1, 2, Christian Toso, MD, PhD 1, 2
1 Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland 
2 Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland 
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland 

Reprint requests: Pouya Iranmanesh, Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.Department of Digestive and Transplant SurgeryGeneva University HospitalsRue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 41205 GenevaSwitzerland

Abstract

Background and Aims

Initial cholecystectomy for patients at intermediate risk of common bile duct (CBD) stones (including increased liver function tests but bilirubin <4 mg/dL and no cholangitis) showed shorter length of stay and fewer CBD investigations without increased morbidity compared with sequential CBD endoscopic assessment and subsequent cholecystectomy in a randomized controlled trial. The objectives were to prospectively validate these results in daily clinical practice and discuss current guidelines.

Methods

Initial cholecystectomy has become the standard management strategy at Geneva University Hospitals since July 2013 for patients at intermediate risk of CBD stones admitted with acute gallstone-related conditions. Between July 2013 and December 2014, length of stay, number of CBD investigations, and number of adverse events were recorded for these patients and compared with the data of the patients in the randomized controlled trial.

Results

Data for 161 consecutive newly assessed patients at intermediate risk of CBD stones confirmed shorter length of stay (7.6 vs 9.8 days; P < .001), fewer CBD investigations (0.8 vs 1.4 investigations per patient; P < .001), and similar adverse event rates (5.6% vs 14%, P = .14 including all adverse events; 3.1% vs 8%, P = .22 including only grade ≥III adverse events, defined by endoscopic/surgical reintervention or intensive care unit admission) compared with the previously reported group of patients who underwent preoperative CBD investigations.

Conclusions

These data confirm that initial cholecystectomy results in a shorter length of stay without increased morbidity among patients at intermediate risk of CBD stones compared with sequential CBD assessment and subsequent cholecystectomy. This approach may change current guidelines.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : ASGE, BMI, CBD, IOC, LFT, RUQ, SAGES


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: Christian Toso was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P3_139021). This funding was independent of this work. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.


© 2017  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 85 - N° 4

P. 794-802 - aprile 2017 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Can we preserve sphincter of Oddi function by avoiding sphincterotomy? Do we want to?
  • Alejandro L. Suarez, Gregory A. Coté
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Comparison of nonampullary duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis versus patients with sporadic adenomas
  • Lisa S. Cassani, Gandhi Lanke, Hsiang-Chun Chen, Xuemei Wang, Patrick Lynch, Jeffrey H. Lee

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.