Abbonarsi

Incomplete revascularization for percutaneous coronary interventions: Variation among operators, and association with operator and hospital characteristics - 16/05/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.01.015 
Edward L. Hannan, PhD a, , Ye Zhong, MD a, Alice K. Jacobs, MD b, Frederick S.K. Ling, MD c, Peter B. Berger, MD d, Gary Walford, MD e, Ferdinand J. Venditti, MD f, Spencer B. King, MD g
a State University of New York, University at Albany, Albany, NY 
b Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 
c University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 
d Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY 
e Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 
f Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 
g St Joseph's Health System, Atlanta, GA 

Reprint requests: Edward L. Hannan, PhD, School of Public Health, State University of New York, University at Albany, One University Place, Rensselaer, NY 12144-3456.School of Public Health, State University of New York, University at AlbanyOne University PlaceRensselaerNY12144-3456

Abstract

Background

Many studies have compared outcomes for incomplete revascularization (IR) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), but little is known about the correlates of IR, the extent to which complete revascularization (CR) was attempted unsuccessfully, and the variation across operators in the use of IR.

Methods

New York's PCI registry was used to examine medium-term mortality for IR, the variables associated with the use of IR, and the variation across operators in the utilization of IR after controlling for patient factors.

Results

Incomplete revascularization occurred for 63% of all patients and was significantly associated with higher 3-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio1.35, 95% CI 1.23-1.48) than for CR. A total of 96% of all attempted CRs were successful. Operators with 15 or fewer years in practice (the lowest half) used IR significantly more (65% vs 61%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.37) than other operators, and operators with annual volumes of 171 or lower (the lowest 3 quartiles) used IR more than other operators (68% vs 60%, AOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59). Also, hospitals with annual volumes of 645 and lower (the lowest 50% of hospitals) used IR more (67% vs 62%, AOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.99) than other hospitals.

Conclusions

Percutaneous coronary intervention patients without myocardial infarction who undergo IR continue to have higher medium-term (3-year) risk-adjusted mortality rates. There is a large amount of variability among operators in the frequency with which IR occurs. Operators who have been in practice longer, and higher-volume operators and hospitals have lower rates of IR. Failed attempts at CR occur very infrequently.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 186

P. 118-126 - aprile 2017 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The impact of body mass index on the wearable cardioverter defibrillator shock efficacy and patient wear time
  • Chingping Wan, Steven J. Szymkiewicz, Helmut U. Klein
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Aerobic exercise training and general health status in ambulatory heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction—Findings from the Heart Failure and A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training (HF-ACTION)trial
  • Andrew P. Ambrosy, Lukasz P. Cerbin, Adam D. DeVore, Stephen J. Greene, William E. Kraus, Christopher M. O'Connor, Ileana L. Piña, David J. Whellan, Daniel Wojdyla, Angie Wu, Robert J. Mentz

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.