How satisfied are patients with interprofessional teams? Meta-analysis of a pilot study - 08/07/17
| pagine | 2 |
| Iconografia | 1 |
| Video | 0 |
| Altro | 0 |
Riassunto |
Introduction |
A doctor–patient encounter is a dyadic interaction between two people, one needing help and the other providing it. However, the encounter between an interprofessional team and a patient is changing this picture.
Objectives |
To measure how patient satisfaction changes when patients are treated by an interprofessional team.
Aims |
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) directly evaluates patient satisfaction when patients interact with interprofessional teams. This research is a before-and-after study of undergraduate health care students undergoing interprofessional education. Answers to questions on a 5-point Likert scale (from “Totally satisfied” to “Totally unsatisfied”) were uploaded online on a survey platform linked to a dedicated app.
Methods |
Twenty-nine undergraduate students before, and eight after, interprofessional training reported their evaluation of patient satisfaction with interprofessional teams. Meta-analysis used Tau2, Cochrane's Q and I2.
Results |
Meta-analysis showed a homogeneity in the answers before and after IPE training (P=0.4) and variability of only I2=39%, with t2=.006, and Q (4 df)=4.0. To a certain degree, the study showed a drop before and after in students who report their patients being “moderately satisfied” (from 20.7% to 0%), with C.I. 95%=4.702 (0.238–92.713) (Fig. 1).
Conclusions |
This study requires further inquiry on why a moderate level of patient satisfaction declines when patients are treated by an interprofessional team.
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Mappa
Vol 41 - N° S
P. S298-S299 - aprile 2017 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
