Abbonarsi

Skin mapping for the classification of generalized morphea - 13/01/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.08.052 
Noelle Teske, MD, MSc a, Joseph Welser, MD b, Heidi Jacobe, MD, MSCS a,
a Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 
b Department of Urology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center at Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 

Correspondence to: Heidi Jacobe, MD, MSCS, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9069.Department of DermatologyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center5323 Harry Hines BlvdDallasTX75390-9069

Abstract

Background

Generalized morphea lacks cohesive clinical features, limiting its clinical and investigative utility.

Objective

We sought to use computerized lesion mapping to objectively subtype morphea.

Methods

We conducted a 2-part cross-sectional study. In part 1, we created a discovery cohort of patients with generalized morphea of whom lesion maps were created to characterize subsets. Clinical and demographic features were compared between proposed subsets to determine if they identified clinically relevant differences. In part 2, we created a validation cohort to determine if proposed criteria were applicable to different individuals.

Results

A total of 123 patients with generalized morphea were included. Mapping produced 2 distribution patterns that encompassed the majority in both cohorts: isomorphic (areas of skin friction) and symmetric (symmetrically distributed on trunk/extremities). In the discovery cohort, the isomorphic subset was older (55.6 ± 12.7 vs 42.2 ± 20.1 years, P < .001), all female (30/30 vs 38/43, P = .05), and more often had lichen sclerosus changes (12/43 vs 8/43, P = .02); involvement of the reticular dermis, subcutaneous fat, and/or fascia was more common in symmetric (10/43 vs 1/30) (P = .02). These features persisted in the validation cohort.

Limitations

Single cohort was a limitation.

Conclusions

Symmetric and isomorphic subsets possess distinctive demographic and clinical features, suggesting they more accurately define the phenotype of generalized morphea. Consideration should be given to revising classification.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : clinical research, cohort study, cross-sectional study, disease registry, localized scleroderma, morphea, skin mapping


Mappa


 Research for this manuscript was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant no. K23AR056303-5. This work was conducted with support from the University of Texas-Science and Technology Acquisition and Retention Program (UT-STAR), NIH/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) grant number 4UL1TR001105-04/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant no. UL1TR000451. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of UT-STAR, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and its affiliated academic and health care centers, NCRR, or NIH.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.
 Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2016  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 78 - N° 2

P. 351-357 - febbraio 2018 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Efficacy and tolerance profile of thalidomide in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • François Chasset, Toufik Tounsi, Elise Cesbron, Annick Barbaud, Camille Francès, Laurent Arnaud
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Epidemiology of hyperhidrosis in 2 population-based health care databases
  • Kristen Ricchetti-Masterson, J. Morel Symons, Molly Aldridge, Ayush Patel, Joe Maskell, John Logie, Yuji Yamaguchi, Suzanne F. Cook

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.