Abbonarsi

A real-world, community-based cohort study comparing the effectiveness of topical fluorouracil versus topical imiquimod for the treatment of actinic keratosis - 14/03/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.042 
Romain Neugebauer, PhD a, Katherine A. Levandoski, BS b, Zheng Zhu, MS a, Monica Sokil, BA, BS a, Mary-Margaret Chren, MD c, Gary D. Friedman, MD, MS a, Maryam M. Asgari, MD, MPH a, b,
a Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California 
b Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 
c Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, California 

Correspondence to: Maryam M. Asgari, MD, MPH, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, Suite 270, Boston, MA 02114.Department of DermatologyMassachusetts General Hospital50 Staniford St, Suite 270BostonMA02114

Abstract

Background

The most widely used topical agents for the field-based treatment of multiple actinic keratoses (AKs) are 5-fluorouracil and imiquimod, but their comparative effectiveness has not been assessed in a real-world setting.

Objective

We compared the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil and imiquimod in reducing risk for subsequent AKs in a large, integrated health care delivery system in northern California.

Methods

In this cohort study, we identified adult health plan members who had an AK diagnosed in 2007 and who subsequently filled a prescription for 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod (N = 5700). We followed subjects for subsequent AKs identified by the International Classification of Diseases codes and estimated the 2-year (short-term) and 5-year (long-term) differences in cumulative risk while controlling for potential confounding by pretreatment variables.

Results

5-Fluorouracil reduced the short-term incidence of subsequent AKs (cumulative risk difference -4.54% [95% confidence interval, -7.91% to -1.17%]), but there was no statistically significant evidence of a long-term decreased risk (cumulative risk difference -1.43% [95% confidence interval, -3.43% to 0.05%]) compared with that with imiquimod.

Limitations

This is a retrospective study with limited ascertainment of all relevant potential confounding variables.

Conclusion

We found that 5-fluorouracil appeared to be significantly more effective than imiquimod in the short-term, but not long-term, prevention of subsequent AKs.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, comparative effectiveness, keratinocyte carcinoma, skin cancer, squamous cell carcinoma

Abbreviations used : AK, CI, 5-FU, ICD-9, Imq, IP, IPW, KC, KPNC, PS


Mappa


 Funding sources: Supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grants R03AR064014 and K24AR069760 to MA).
 Disclosure: Dr Asgari has research contracts with Pfizer and Valeant Pharmaceuticals that are not relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Dr Neugebauer, Ms Levandoski, Ms Zhu, Ms Sokil, Dr Chren, and Dr Friedman have no conflicts of interest to disclosed.
 Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2017  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 78 - N° 4

P. 710-716 - aprile 2018 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Estimating the cost of skin cancer detection by dermatology providers in a large health care system
  • Martha Matsumoto, Aaron Secrest, Alyce Anderson, Melissa I. Saul, Jonhan Ho, John M. Kirkwood, Laura K. Ferris
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Fibrous cephalic plaques in tuberous sclerosis complex
  • Oyetewa Oyerinde, Danielle Buccine, Alison Treichel, Claire Hong, Chyi-Chia Richard Lee, Joel Moss, Thomas N. Darling

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.