Laparotomy and intraoperative enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding before and after the era of video capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy: A tertiary center experience - 20/03/18
, O. Joe Hines b, c, e, Thomas Kovacs b, c, d, Gordon Ohning b, c, d, Rome Jutabha b, c, Kevin Ghassemi b, c, Gareth S. Dulai b, c, d, Gustavo Machicado b, c, dAbstract |
Background |
To evaluate roles of intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) in management of severe obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) before vs. after introduction of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and deep enteroscopy (DE).
Methods |
We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of patients undergoing IOE for severe OGIB in a tertiary referral center.
Results |
52 patients had laparotomy/IOE for OGIB, 11 pre and 41 post VCE/DE eras. In the pre VCE/DE era, 36.4% (4/11) had preoperative presumptive diagnoses while in the post VCE/DE era presumptive diagnoses were made in 48.8% (20/41) (p = 0.18). Preoperative evaluation led to correct diagnoses in 18.2% (2/11) in the pre and 51.2% (21/41) in the post VCE/DE era (p = 0.09). Vascular lesions and ulcers were the most common diagnoses, but rebleeding was common. No rebleeding was found among patients with tumors, Meckel's diverticulum, and aortoenteric fistula.
Conclusions |
Presumptive diagnoses in the post VCE/DE era were usually accurate. If VCE or DE are negative, the probability of negative IOE is high. Patients with tumors and Meckel's diverticulum were the best candidates for IOE.
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Keywords : Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Deep enteroscopy, Video capsule endoscopy, Intraoperative enteroscopy, Exploratory laparotomy
Mappa
Vol 215 - N° 4
P. 603-609 - aprile 2018 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
