Abbonarsi

Implementation of a systematic culturing program to monitor the efficacy of endoscope reprocessing: outcomes and costs - 21/06/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.001 
Gene K. Ma, MD 1, , David A. Pegues, MD 2, Michael L. Kochman, MD 1, Kevin Alby, MD 3, Neil O. Fishman, MD 2, Marianne Saunders, RN, MSN, CNOR 4, Carolyn Grous, RN, MSN, CNOR 4, Daniel T. Dempsey, MD 4, Gregory G. Ginsberg, MD 1
1 Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 
2 Infectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 
3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 
4 Perioperative Services, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 

Reprint requests: Gene K. Ma, MD, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, PCAM South Pavilion, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104.3400 Civic Center BoulevardPCAM South Pavilion7th FloorPhiladelphiaPA19104

Abstract

Background and Aims

In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidance for duodenoscope culturing and reprocessing in response to outbreaks of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) duodenoscope-related infections. Based on this guidance, we implemented best practices for reprocessing and developed a systematic process for culturing endoscopes with elevator levers. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and direct costs of this program.

Methods

First, clinical microbiology data from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed retrospectively to assess for possible elevator lever-equipped endoscope-related CRE infections. Second, a program to systematically culture elevator lever-equipped endoscopes was implemented. Each week, about 25% of the inventory of elevator lever-equipped endoscopes is cultured based on the CDC guidelines. If any cultures return bacterial growth, the endoscope is quarantined pending repeat culturing. The costs of the program, including staff time and supplies, have been calculated.

Results

From 2011 to 2014, none of 17 patients with documented CRE infection had undergone ERCP or endoscopic ultrasound in the previous 36 months. From June 2015 to September 2016, 285 cultures were performed. Three (1.1%) had bacterial growth, 2 with skin contaminants and 1 with an oral contaminant. The associated endoscopes were quarantined and reprocessed, and repeat cultures were negative. The total estimated cost of our program for an inventory of 20 elevator lever-equipped endoscopes was $30,429.60 per year ($1521.48 per endoscope).

Conclusions

This 16-month evaluation of a systematic endoscope culturing program identified a low rate of positive cultures after elevator lever endoscope reprocessing. All positive cultures were with non-enteric microorganisms. The program was of modest cost and identified reprocessing procedures that may have led to a low rate of positive cultures.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : AGA, ASGE, CDC, CRE, FDA, LAE


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Ma at gene.ma@uphs.upenn.edu.


© 2018  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 87 - N° 1

P. 104 - gennaio 2018 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Recurrent symptoms after per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia: Redo, dilate, or operate? A call for a tailored approach
  • Ming-ming Xu, Michel Kahaleh
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Electromagnetic-guided placement of nasoduodenal feeding tubes versus endoscopic placement: a randomized, multicenter trial
  • Wouter F.W. Kappelle, Daisy Walter, Paul H. Stadhouders, Hendrik J.A. Jebbink, Frank P. Vleggaar, Peter J. van der Schaar, Jan Willem Kappelle, Ingeborg van der Tweel, Medard F.M. Van den Broek, Frank J. Wessels, Peter D. Siersema, Jan F. Monkelbaan

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.