New-generation full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, tandem colonoscopy trial (J-FUSE Study) - 10/10/18
Abstract |
Background and Aims |
Although colonoscopy is the criterion standard for detection of colorectal adenomas, some adenomas are missed. Full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) allows for observation with a 330-degree angle of view, which is expected to decrease the miss rate. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the superiority of FUSE over standard forward-viewing colonoscopy (SFVC) for detection of adenomas; we therefore compared new-generation FUSE and SFVC regarding colorectal adenoma miss rate (AMR) in this, the first reported randomized control trial using new-generation FUSE.
Methods |
We enrolled individuals aged 40 to 75 years who had been referred for screening, surveillance, fecal occult blood test positivity, or symptoms in a prospective randomized trial of tandem colonoscopy in 8 institutions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via computer-generated stratified randomization. Neither the endoscopists nor patients were blinded to the allocation. The primary endpoint was AMR per patient (AMR-PP).
Results |
We enrolled 345 patients and included 319 in the per-protocol analyses. AMR-PP was significantly lower with FUSE (11.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0%-15.4%) than with SFVC (22.9%; 95% CI, 17.5%-28.3%; P < .001). AMR-PP for lesions ≤5 mm in size was significantly lower with FUSE (10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-14.3%) than with SFVC (20.0%; 95% CI, 14.4%-25.6%; P = .0057). Furthermore, AMR-PP in the ascending colon was significantly lower with FUSE (4.3%; 95% CI, 1.4%-7.2%) than with SFVC (10.6%; 95% CI, 6.1%-15.1%; P = .0212).
Conclusions |
FUSE is superior to SFVC regarding both AMR-PP and AMR; additionally, AMR-PP is both significantly lower with FUSE than SFVC for lesions ≤5 mm in size and in the ascending colon. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000020448.)
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Abbreviations : ADR, AMR, AMR-PP, CRC, EU, FUSE, PMR, PMR-PP, SCIR, SFVC
Mappa
| DISCLOSURE: The following author disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: S. Kudo: Consultant for and study funding from Adachi Corporation. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. Research support for this study was provided by Adachi, Osaka, Japan. |
|
| See CME section, p. 868. |
|
| If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Kudo at s6027@nms.ac.jp. |
Vol 88 - N° 5
P. 854-864 - novembre 2018 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
