Abbonarsi

Normal Saline Solution and Lactated Ringer’s Solution Have a Similar Effect on Quality of Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial - 21/01/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.07.007 
Andrew Friederich, BA a, Natalie Martin, BA a, Morgan B. Swanson, BS a, Brett A. Faine, PharmD, MS a, b, Nicholas M. Mohr, MD, MS a, c, ⁎
a Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 
b Department of Pharmaceutical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 
c Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 

∗Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that balanced crystalloids improve quality of recovery more than normal saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) in stable emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary outcomes measured differences in health care use.

Methods

A single-site, participant- and evaluator-blinded, 2-arm parallel allocation (1:1), comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial allocated adults receiving intravenous fluids in the ED before discharge to receive 2 L of lactated Ringer’s solution or normal saline solution. The primary outcome was symptom scores measured by the validated Quality of Recovery–40 instrument (scores 40 to 200) 24 hours after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and medication compliance.

Results

Participants (N=157) were enrolled and follow-up was analyzed for 94 (follow-up rate of 60%) with intention-to-treat methodology. There was no difference in postenrollment Quality of Recovery–40 scores between normal saline solution and lactated Ringer’s solution groups (mean difference 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] –6.8 to 11.6). Although preenrollment scores were higher in the lactated Ringer’s solution group (mean difference 10.5; 95% CI 1.9 to 19.0), adjusting for presurvey imbalances did not change the primary outcome (adjusted difference –3.9; 95% CI –12.9 to 5.2). There were no differences in return to ED (mean difference 7.5%; 95% CI –8.7% to 23.8%), prescriptions filled (mean difference 22.2%; 95% CI –3.3% to 47.6%), or seeking care from another provider (mean difference –2.0%; 95% CI –19.9% to 15.9%) at 7 days.

Conclusion

Normal saline solution and lactated Ringer’s solution were associated with similar 24-hour recovery scores and 7-day health care use in stable ED patients. These results supplement those of recent trials by informing fluid choice for stable ED patients.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Please see page 161 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Allan B. Wolfson, MD
 Author contributions: All authors completed the initial literature search and critically reviewed the article. AF and NM completed participant consent and data collection and drafted the article. MBS, BAF, and NMM developed the study design. MBS conducted data analysis. NM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. Research reported in this publication was supported by the University of Iowa Department of Emergency Medicine and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award U54TR001356 and NIH training grant 5 T35 HL 7485-38.
 Trial registration number: NCT03133767
 The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
 Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide MVNZWS2 to Annals on this particular article.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2018  American College of Emergency Physicians. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 73 - N° 2

P. 160-169 - febbraio 2019 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Are Topical Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Useful for Analgesia in Patients With Traumatic Corneal Abrasions?
  • Jason R. West
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Is Normal Saline Solution an Acceptable Choice of Fluid for Stable Patients?
  • David T. Huang, Raghavan Murugan

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.