Abbonarsi

On-Pump Beating Heart Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Early After Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis From the ANZSCTS Database - 21/06/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.06.1051 
Michael Z.L. Zhu, MBBS a, Molla M. Huq, MSc a, Baki M. Billah, PhD a, Lavinia Tran, PhD a, Christopher M. Reid, PhD a, d, Kapilan Varatharajah, MBBS a, Franklin L. Rosenfeldt, MD, FRACS b, c,
a School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia 
b Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia 
c Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia 
d School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9857 6036.Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute75 Commercial RoadMelbourneVic.3004Australia

Riassunto

Background

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries a high risk of mortality. By avoiding cardioplegic arrest and aortic cross-clamping, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBEAT) may benefit patients requiring urgent or emergency revascularisation in the setting of AMI. We evaluated the early and long-term outcomes of ONBEAT versus conventional CABG (ONSTOP) utilising the ANZSCTS National Cardiac Surgery Database.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2015, 5,851 patients underwent non-elective on-pump CABG within 7 days of AMI. Of these, 77 patients (1.3%) underwent ONBEAT and 5774 (98.7%) underwent ONSTOP surgery. Propensity-score matching (with a 1:2 matching ratio) was performed for risk adjustment. Survival data were obtained from the National Death Index.

Results

Before matching, the unadjusted 30-day mortality was ONBEAT: 9/77 (11.7%) vs. ONSTOP: 256/5,774 (4.4%), p<0.001. Preoperative factors independently associated with the ONBEAT were: septuagenarian age, peripheral vascular disease, redo surgery, cardiogenic shock, emergency surgery and single-vessel disease. After propensity-score matching, 30-day mortality was similar (ONBEAT: 9/77 (11.7%) vs. ONSTOP: 16/154 (10.4%), p=0.85), as was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ONBEAT: 17/77 (22.1%) vs. ONSTOP: 38/154 (24.7%), p=0.84). ONBEAT patients received fewer distal anastomoses and were more likely to have incomplete revascularisation (ONBEAT: 15/77 (19.5%) vs. ONSTOP: 15/154, (9.7%), p=0.03). Despite this, 12-year survival was comparable (ONBEAT: 64.8% (95% CI 39.4-82.4%) vs. ONSTOP: 63.6% (95% CI 50.5, 74.3%), p=0.89).

Conclusions

ONBEAT can be performed safely in high-risk patients requiring CABG early after AMI with similar short and long-term survival compared to ONSTOP.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Coronary artery bypass, Myocardial infarction, On-pump, Beating-heart, Cardiac surgery


Mappa


© 2018  Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 28 - N° 8

P. 1267-1276 - agosto 2019 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The Relationship Between Renal Artery Involvement in Stanford B-Type Aortic Dissection and the Short-Term Prognosis: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Ang Li, Dilinuer Mohetaer, Qian Zhao, Xiang Ma, YiTong Ma
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • The Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Approach and Conventional Median Sternotomy for Coronary Artery Fistula Correction
  • Laichun Song, Yaling Dong, Bo Wang, Jinjun Li, Xiaofei Qi, Xiang Gao, Zhengdong Hua, Chao Tao, Bihui He, Liang Tao

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.