Self-sizing radiofrequency ablation balloon for eradication of Barrett's esophagus: results of an international multicenter randomized trial comparing 3 different treatment regimens - 19/08/19
Abstract |
Background and Aims |
Recently, the 360 Express radiofrequency ablation balloon catheter (360 Express, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn, USA) has replaced the traditional system for circumferential radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett’s esophagus (BE). The aim was to compare 3 different ablation regimens for the 360 Express.
Methods |
An international multicenter noninferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in which patients with a BE (2-15 cm) with dysplasia or early cancer were randomly assigned to the standard (1 × 10 J/cm2-clean-1 × 10 J/cm2), simple-double (2 × 10 J/cm2-no clean), or simple-single ablation regimen (1 × 10 J/cm2-no clean). The primary outcome was the percentage endoscopically visual BE regression at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, adverse events, and patient discomfort.
Results |
Between September 2015 and October 2017, 104 patients were enrolled. The simple-double ablation arm was closed prematurely because of a 21% stenosis rate. The trial continued with the standard (n = 37) and simple-single arm (n = 38). Both arms were comparable at baseline. Noninferiority of the simple-single arm could not be demonstrated: BE regression was 73% in the simple-single arm versus 85% in the standard arm; the median difference was 13% (95% confidence interval, 5%-23%). The procedure time was significantly longer in the standard arm (31 vs 17 minutes, P < .001). Both groups were comparable with regard to adverse events and patient discomfort.
Conclusions |
This randomized trial shows that circumferential RFA with the 360 Express using the simple-double ablation regimen results in an unacceptable high risk of stenosis. Furthermore, the results suggest that a single ablation at 10 J/cm2 results in inferior BE regression at 3 months. We therefore advise using the standard ablation regimen (1 × 10 J/cm2-clean-1 × 10 J/cm2) for treatment of BE using the 360 Express. (Clinical trial registration number: NTR5191.)
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Abbreviations : 360 Express, BE, CI, DSMB, EID, ER, m-ITT, IQR, MEC, RFA, SD, WLE
Mappa
| If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Bergman at [email protected]. |
|
| DISCLOSURE: Dr Koch has received research support from Cook Medical and Interscope and speaker and consultancy fees from ErbeElektromedizin. Dr Weusten has received research support and speaker fees from Pentax Medical. Dr Schoon has received speaker and consultancy fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Olympus, and research support from Fujifilm. Dr Haidry has received research support from Cook Medical, Pentax Europe, Medtronic, Beamline Technologies, and C2 Therapeutics. Dr Pech has received speaker fees from Medtronic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Boston Scientific, Falk, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Creo Medical. Dr Bergman has received research support from Medtronic, Olympus Endoscopy, Cook Medical, Boston Scientific, Erbe Medical, C2 Therapeutic, and Ninepoint Medical, and consultancy fees from Cook Medical and Boston Scientific. Dr Bisschops has received research support from Pentax, Fujifilm, and Cook Medical, speaker fees from Medtronic and Pentax, and consultancy fees from Medtronic, Pentax, Fujifilm, and Boston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. |
|
| See CME section, p. 506. |
Vol 90 - N° 3
P. 415-423 - settembre 2019 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
