Abbonarsi

Variations in the utilization of immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction - 26/09/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.025 
Apoorve Nayyar a, b, ⁎ , Paula D. Strassle b, c, Karishma G. Reddy b, Danielle I. Jameison b, Cara G. Moses b, Michelle C. Roughton b, Kandace P. McGuire d, e, Kristalyn K. Gallagher a, b
a UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 
b Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA 
c Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 
d Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA 
e Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA 

∗Corresponding author. Post-Doctoral Research Associate Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 170 Manning Drive, Division of Surgical Oncology, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.Post-Doctoral Research Associate Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 170 Manning DriveDivision of Surgical OncologyChapel HillNC27599USA

Abstract

Background

For female breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing mastectomy, post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) confers significant psychosocial benefits and improved cosmetic outcomes. The objective of this study is to explore whether the utilization of PMBR varies by race, marital status, and geographical location of the patient.

Methods

Women ≥18 years old who underwent mastectomy for breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 were eligible. Women with inflammatory BC, Stage IV BC diagnoses, and bilateral BC were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for patient and cancer characteristics, were used to assess the association between of race, marital status, and region on immediate PMBR utilization.

Results

321,206 women were included and 24% underwent immediate PMBR (<4 months after mastectomy). Compared to white women, black and other non-white women (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.65, 0.70 and OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.50, 0.53, respectively) were significantly less likely to receive PMBR. Additionally, women who were single (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.70, 0.75) or no longer married (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82, 0.86) were significantly less likely to undergo breast reconstruction, compared to married women. Regional differences were also seen, with women in the Northeast (OR 2.11, 95% CI 2.05,2.17), Midwest (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48, 1.58) and South (OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.17, 1.23) all being more likely to undergo breast reconstruction compared to the West.

Discussion

Significant variations exist in the utilization of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction across race, marital status or geographical location of the patient. Further research is needed to elucidate these differences and identify areas for intervention to increase awareness, and access to reconstruction for all breast cancer patients.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Highlights

•
The majority (76%) of breast cancer patients receiving mastectomy do not undergo breast reconstruction.
•
Compared to white women, black and other non-white women less likely to receive breast reconstruction.
•
Single and divorced/separated women less likely to undergo breast reconstruction, compared to married women.
•
Women in the Northeast, Midwest and South region of the United States more likely to undergo breast reconstruction compared to the West.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Breast cancer, Mastectomy, Breast reconstruction, Disparities, Regional variations


Mappa


© 2019  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 218 - N° 4

P. 712-715 - ottobre 2019 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Comparison of costs and short-term clinical outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic Heller myotomy
  • Andrea Wirsching, Piers R. Boshier, Fredrik Klevebro, Stephen J. Kaplan, Maarten FJ. Seesing, Rasheed El-Moslimany, Andrew Ross, Donald E. Low
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Suspected appendicitis pathway continues to lower CT rates in children two years after implementation
  • Lori A. Gurien, Samuel D. Smith, Melvin S. Dassinger, Jeffrey M. Burford, Joseph J. Tepas, Marie Crandall

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.