Abbonarsi

Clinical evaluation of double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures: A retrospective case-control study - 05/12/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.019 
Alexander Ellwein a, b, , Konstantinos Argiropoulos b, Rony-Orijit DeyHazra b, Marc-Frederic Pastor a, Tomas Smith a, Helmut Lill b
a Department for Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, DIAKOVERE Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Straße 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany 
b Department for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, DIAKOVERE Friederikenstift, Humboldtstr 5, 30169 Hannover, Germany 

Corresponding author at: Department for Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, DIAKOVERE Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Straße 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.Department for Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, DIAKOVERE AnnastiftAnna-von-Borries-Straße 1-7Hannover30625Germany

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Introduction

Single, dorsal plating is a commonly used technique for treating olecranon fractures. Double-plate osteosynthesis is an alternative treatment. Aim of this study was to present the surgical technique using this novel double-plate implant for olecranon fractures and review clinical results, complication rates and revision surgeries. Results were compared to single, dorsal plating.

Hypothesis

Does double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures improve material's tolerance with respect to osteosynthesis by single dorsal plating?

Patients and methods

Between February 2011 and March 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 47 patients who were included in this study: 25 were treated with a low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and 22 with an anatomically pre-shaped 3.5mm locking compression plate (LCP). The 2 groups were the result of a change of implants in our department in 2013. Patient satisfaction, range of motion, patient related outcome scores (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS], Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score [DASH]), complications and revision surgeries were evaluated. Results between both implant types were statistically compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 41 months (range: 25–61), the low-profile double-plate group showed a range of motion of 127°, MEPS of 94 and DASH of 6. The 3.5mm LCP group was found to have a range of motion of 130°, MEPS of 96 and DASH of 8. No clinical difference was found between groups. A total of 9 revision surgeries after double-plate osteosynthesis were recorded including seven implant removals and two intraarticular screws. One loosening of a screw without revision surgery was reported. The 3.5mm LCP group had 9 revision surgeries including eight implant removals and one intraarticular screw.

Discussion

Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis is a safe and effective alternative treatment of olecranon fractures. Subjective and objective clinical outcome measures revealed a low complication rate and excellent results. Still, implant removal due to soft tissue irritation remains an issue. These findings were comparable to common dorsal plate osteosynthesis.

Level of evidence

III, retrospective case-control study.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Olecranon fracture, Double-plate osteosynthesis, Low-profile, LCP, Complication


Mappa


© 2019  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 105 - N° 8

P. 1601-1606 - dicembre 2019 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Advantages of expulsion-proof pins in the treatment of olecranon fractures with tension band wiring: Comparison with a control group
  • Rémi Di Francia, Hoel Letissier, Dominique Le Nen, Christian Lefèvre, Frédéric Dubrana, Éric Stindel
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Total wrist denervation: Retrospective study of 39 wrists with 56 months’ follow-up
  • Baptiste Picart, Clément Laborie, Christophe Hulet, Mélanie Malherbe

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.