Abbonarsi

Prevalence and Impact of Having Multiple Barriers to Medication Adherence in Nonadherent Patients With Poorly Controlled Cardiometabolic Disease - 08/01/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.043 
Julie C. Lauffenburger, PharmD, PhD a, b, , Thomas Isaac, MD, MBA, MPH c, Romit Bhattacharya, MD d, Thomas D. Sequist, MD, MPH e, Chandrasekar Gopalakrishnan, MD, MPH b, Niteesh K. Choudhry, MD, PhD a, b
a Department of Medicine, Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 
b Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 
c Atrius Health, Newton, Massachusetts 
d Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 
e Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Health Care Policy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 

Corresponding author: Tel: 617-525-8865; fax: 617-232-8602.

Riassunto

Adherence to medications remains poor despite numerous efforts to identify and intervene upon nonadherence. One potential explanation is the limited focus of many interventions on one barrier. Little is known about the prevalence and impact of having multiple barriers in contemporary practice. Our objective was to quantify adherence barriers for patients with poorly controlled cardiometabolic condition, identify patient characteristics associated with having multiple barriers, and determine its impact on adherence. We used a linked electronic health records and insurer claims dataset from a large health system from a recent pragmatic trial. Barriers to medication taking before the start of the intervention were elicited by clinical pharmacists using structured interviews. We used multivariable modified Poisson regression models to examine the association between patient factors and multiple barriers and multivariable linear regression to evaluate the relation between multiple barriers and claims-based adherence. Of the 1,069 patients (mean: 61 years of age) in this study, 25.1% had multiple barriers to adherence; the most common co-occurring barriers were forgetfulness and health beliefs (31%, n = 268). Patients with multiple barriers were more likely to be non-white (relative risk [RR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21 to 1.74), be single/unpartnered (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.74), use tobacco (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.11), and have poor glycemic control (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.39) versus those with 0 or 1 barrier. Each additional barrier worsened average adherence by 3.1% (95% CI −4.6%, −1.5%). In conclusion, >25% of nonadherent patients present with multiple barriers to optimal use, leading to meaningful differences in adherence. These findings should inform quality improvement interventions aimed at nonadherence.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Funding: This research was supported by a grant from the NIH, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) to BWH grant R01 HL 117918. Dr Lauffenburger was supported by a career development grant K01 HL 141538 from the NIH, NHLBI (Bethesda, MD).


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 125 - N° 3

P. 376-382 - febbraio 2020 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Usefulness of a Lifestyle Intervention in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
  • Eva R. Broers, Giovana Gavidia, Mart Wetzels, Vicent Ribas, Idowu Ayoola, Jordi Piera-Jimenez, Jos W.M.G. Widdershoven, Mirela Habibovi?, Do CHANGE consortium
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Dabigatran Persistence and Outcomes Following Discontinuation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients from the GLORIA-AF Registry
  • Miney Paquette, Lionel Riou França, Christine Teutsch, Hans-Christoph Diener, Shihai Lu, Sergio J. Dubner, Chang Sheng Ma, Kenneth J. Rothman, Kristina Zint, Jonathan L. Halperin, Brian Olshansky, Menno V. Huisman, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Robby Nieuwlaat

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.