Abbonarsi

Impact of Multiplex Testing on the Identification of Pediatric Clostridiodes Difficile - 20/02/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.11.036 
Jillian M. Cotter, MD, MSCS 1, ⁎ , Jacob Thomas, MS 2, Meghan Birkholz, MSPH 3, Mark Brittan, MD, MPH 1, 2, Lilliam Ambroggio, PhD, MPH 1, 4, Susan Dolan, RN, MS, CIC FAPIC 5, Kelly Pearce, BA 5, James Todd, MD 3, Samuel R. Dominguez, MD, PhD 3
1 Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 
2 Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 
3 Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 
4 Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 
5 Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 

∗Reprint requests: Jillian M. Cotter, MD, MSCS, Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 E 16th Ave, Box B302, Aurora, CO 80045.Section of Hospital MedicineDepartment of PediatricsChildren's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine13123 E 16th AveBox B302AuroraCO80045

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate whether the implementation of a multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIP) was associated with changes in Clostridioides difficile (C difficile) testing and detection rates.

Study design

We conducted an observational study using interrupted time series analysis and included pediatric patients with testing capable of detecting C difficile. From 2013 to 2015 (“conventional diagnostic era”), stool testing included C difficile-selective polymerase chain reaction and other pathogen-specific tests. From 2015 to 2017 (“GIP era”), C difficile polymerase chain reaction was available along with the GIP, which detected 22 pathogens including C difficile, and replaced the need for additional tests. Outcomes included C difficile testing and detection rates in ambulatory, emergency department, and inpatient settings.

Results

There were 6841 tests performed and 1214 C difficile positive results. Across the 3 settings, GIP era had significantly higher C difficile testing (1.7-2.3 times higher) and C difficile detection rates (1.9-3.4 times higher) compared with conventional diagnostic era. After adjusting for the number of tests performed, detection rates were no longer significantly different. Of C difficile positive GIPs, 31% were coinfected with another organism. With GIP testing, patients 1 year of age had a significantly higher C difficile percent positivity than 2-year-old (P = .02) and 3- to 18-year-old children (P < .01). Younger children with C difficile were more likely to be coinfected (P < .01).

Conclusions

Introducing a multiplex panel led to increased C difficile testing, which resulted in increased C difficile detection rates and potential identification and treatment of colonized patients. This highlights an important target for diagnostic stewardship and the challenges associated with multiplex testing.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : multiplex panel, syndromic panel, diagnostic stewardship, colonization, Clostridium difficile

Abbreviations : CDC, C difficile, CDI, CO, CO-HCFA, ED/UC, EMR, GI, GIP, HO, ITS, NHSN, PCR


Mappa


 S.D. receives grant support and serves as a consultant for BioFire Diagnostics. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 218

P. 157 - marzo 2020 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • A Cross-Sectional Study of Caregiver Perceptions of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Knowledge and Attitudes about Screening
  • Marissa L. Diener, Kevin Shi, Albert H. Park
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Health Outcomes of Parents of Children with Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Liel N. Cohn, Petros Pechlivanoglou, Yuna Lee, Sanjay Mahant, Julia Orkin, Alanna Marson, Eyal Cohen

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.