Abbonarsi

Digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy-guided biopsy sampling versus ERCP-guided brushing for indeterminate biliary strictures: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial (with video) - 20/04/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.025 
Christian Gerges, MD 1, , Torsten Beyna, MD 1, , Raymond S.Y. Tang, MD 2, Farzan Bahin, FRACP, PhD 1, James Y.W. Lau, MD, PhD 2, Erwin van Geenen, MD, PhD 3, Horst Neuhaus, MD 1, Duvvur Nageshwar Reddy, MD 4, 5, Mohan Ramchandani, MD 5,
1 Department of General Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany 
2 Institute of Digestive Disease, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong 
3 Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong 
4 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 
5 Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India 

Reprint requests: Mohan Ramchandani, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500032, India.Asian Institute of Gastroenterology HospitalsGachibowliHyderabad500032India

Abstract

Background and Aims

Accurately diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures is challenging but important for patient prognostication and further management. Biopsy sampling under direct cholangioscopic vision might be superior to standard ERCP techniques such as brushing or biopsy sampling. Our aim was to investigate whether digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) compared with standard ERCP workup improves the diagnostic yield in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures.

Methods

Patients with an indeterminate biliary stricture on the basis of MRCP were randomized to standard ERCP visualization with tissue brushing (control arm [CA]) or DSOC visualization and DSOC-guided biopsy sampling (study arm [SA]). This was a prospective, international, multicenter trial with a procedure-blinded pathologist.

Results

The first sample sensitivity of DSOC-guided biopsy samples was significantly higher than ERCP-guided brushing (SA 68.2% vs CA 21.4%, P < .01). The sensitivity of visualization (SA 95.5% vs CA 66.7%, P = .02) and overall accuracy (SA 87.1% vs CA 65.5%, P = .05) were significantly higher in the SA compared with the CA, whereas specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value showed no significant difference. Adverse events were equally low in both arms.

Conclusions

DSOC-guided biopsy sampling was shown to be safe and effective with a higher sensitivity compared with standard ERCP techniques in the visual and histopathologic diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT 03140007.)

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : CA, DSOC, SA, TPB


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: C. Gerges: Consultant for Microtech Europe GmbH. T. Beyna: Investigator for Boston Scientific– and Olympus-sponsored trials; consultant and lecture fees from Boston Scientific. J. Y. W. Lau, M. Ramchandani: Investigator for Boston Scientific–sponsored trials. R. Tang: APAC medical advisory board for Boston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships. Statistical and database support for this study was provided by Boston Scientific.
 See CME section; p. 1187.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Ramchandani at ramchandanimohan@gmail.com.


© 2020  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 91 - N° 5

P. 1105-1113 - maggio 2020 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Impact of EUS-guided microforceps biopsy sampling and needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy on the diagnostic yield and clinical management of pancreatic cystic lesions
  • Antonio R. Cheesman, Hongfa Zhu, Xiaoyan Liao, Arnold H. Szporn, Nikhil A. Kumta, Satish Nagula, Christopher J. DiMaio
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Digital single-operator cholangioscopy-guided biopsy for indeterminate biliary strictures: Seeing is believing?
  • Marianna Arvanitakis

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.