Abbonarsi

Are Functional Brain Alterations Present in Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of EEG Studies - 23/07/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.06.010 
Stijn Schouppe *, , Sophie Van Oosterwijck *, Lieven Danneels *, , Stefaan Van Damme , Jessica Van Oosterwijck *, , §
 SPINE Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 
 Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium, www.paininmotion.be 
 Department of Experimental – Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 
§ Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium 

⁎⁎Address reprint requests to Professor Dr. Lieven Danneels, Ghent University, SPINE Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Campus Heymans (UZ) 3B3, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.Ghent UniversitySPINE Research Unit GhentDepartment of Rehabilitation SciencesCampus Heymans (UZ) 3B3, Corneel Heymanslaan 10Ghent9000Belgium

The Journal of Pain – Reference number: JPAIN_2018_399

Highlights

Altered decision making processes in CLBP are suggested.
Postural strategies with a higher cortical attention-demand are suggested in CLBP.
Decreased habituation to painful and auditory stimuli in CLBP was found.
Different types of LBP still need to be examined with EEG, besides CLBP.
Other functional tasks in LBP still need to be examined with EEG.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abstract

This systematic review analyzed available literature on functional brain alterations in low back pain (LBP) measured with electroencephalography (EEG), as until now evidence thereof was unclear. Four electronic databases were systematically searched the 10th of March 2018, resulting in 12 included studies. Studies showed a risk of bias of 37.5 to 75% using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies. Limited evidence reported higher amplitudes of balance-related potentials and early components of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to noxious stimuli, and altered feedback-related negativity and P300 potentials during decision-making in chronic LBP (CLBP). These findings suggest postural strategies requiring a higher cortical attention-demand, increased sensory-discriminative processing of noxious input, and altered decision-making in CLBP. However, further research is warranted as these inferences were based on single studies. Moderate evidence for unaltered amplitude of late-phase SEPs to noxious stimuli and auditory evoked potentials in LBP implies that the affective-emotional processing of stimuli might be unaffected in LBP. Furthermore, moderate evidence indicated disturbed habituation of somatosensory stimuli in LBP. Most studies examined nonspecific or mixed CLBP populations, hence EEG-quantified brain activity in (sub)acute or recurrent LBP still needs to be explored.

Perspective

This review presents an overview of the current understanding of the functional LBP brain measured with EEG. The limited evidence in current research suggests altered cortical function regarding balance control, somatosensory processing, and decision making in LBP, and highlights opportunities for future EEG-research.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : Low back pain, Electroencephalography, Evoked potential, Central nervous system


Mappa


 Funding: This study was funded by an interdisciplinary grant from the Special Research Fund/Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (BOF) at Ghent University (grant number BOF14/IOP/067). Jessica Van Oosterwijck is a Postdoctoral Fellow funded by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) (grant number 12L5616N). Sophie Van Oosterwijck is a PhD researcher supported by a research project grant from the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) received by Lieven Danneels and Jessica Van Oosterwijck (G0B3718N).
 Disclosures: No other potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.


© 2019  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 21 - N° 1-2

P. 25-43 - gennaio 2020 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Genetic Risk of Developing Chronic Postsurgical Pain
  • Vidya Chidambaran, Yang Gang, Valentina Pilipenko, Maria Ashton, Lili Ding
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Quantification of Small Fiber Neuropathy in Chemotherapy-Treated Patients
  • Hannah C. Timmins, Tiffany Li, Matthew C. Kiernan, Lisa G. Horvath, David Goldstein, Susanna B. Park

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.