Abbonarsi

How skilled are skilled facilities? Post-discharge complications after colorectal cancer surgery in the U.S. - 15/06/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.012 
Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz 1, Fabian Grass 1, Kevin T. Behm, Anne-Lise D’Angelo, Kellie L. Mathis, Eric J. Dozois, David W. Larson
 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA 

Corresponding author. Chair of Colon and Rectal Surgery Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.Chair of Colon and Rectal Surgery Department of SurgeryMayo Clinic200 first St. SouthwestRochesterMN55905USA

Abstract

Background

Characteristics and indications for discharging patients to home or a specific facility type have been studied; however, critical evaluation of these facilities through analysis of post-discharge complications and readmission rates is mandatory. The aim of this study was to compare complications occurring after discharge to home, skilled, and unskilled care facilities to identify potential pitfalls.

Methods

All adult (≥18 years) patients who underwent surgery for colon or rectal cancer from 2012 to 2017 as reported in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database were included. Patients were categorized according to the discharge destination into: home, skilled care (rehabilitation center, separate acute care, skilled facility), and unskilled care (multilevel senior community, facility which is home, unskilled facility). Demographics, surgical risk factors and predischarge complications were compared between the three groups. Primary endpoints were overall, major, surgical, and medical complications occurring post-discharge, within 30 days of surgery. Further assessed were specific complications, readmission, length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

Results

A total of 108,617 patients were identified. Of them, 100,478 (92%) discharged to home, 7313 (7%) to skilled, and 826 (1%) to unskilled care. Of patients discharged to skilled care, 1928 (26%) discharged to rehabilitation centers, 368 (5%) to separate acute care, and 5017 (69%) to skilled facilities. Adjusted overall, major, surgical, and medical post-discharge complications were highest among patients discharged to skilled care destinations. Subgroup analysis revealed separate acute care (inter-hospital transfer) to be associated with the highest morbidity. Main reasons for readmission were primarily related to surgical site infection and intestinal obstruction among the three main destinations, whereas readmissions for systemic sepsis and medical complications were more frequent in patients admitted to skilled care.

Conclusion

This study identified higher rates of post-discharge complications associated with skilled care destinations, despite risk adjustment. This over-morbidity is potentially related to prevailing medical complications and inter-hospital transfers. Further studies are needed to better understand those findings and to improve quality of post-acute care and related outcomes.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Highlights

Skilled care destinations are associated with higher rates of post-discharge complications.
This over-morbidity appears to be related to prevailing medical complications and inter-hospital transfers.
Preventive measures are mandatory to improve quality of post-acute care and related outcomes.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Inter-hospital transfer, Discharge destination, Skilled care, Unskilled care, Colorectal surgery


Mappa


© 2020  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 222 - N° 1

P. 20-26 - luglio 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Skilled nursing facility care after colorectal cancer surgery: A call for quality improvement efforts
  • Cristina B. Sanger
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Commentary: Small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETS): Resect or enucleate ? The case for an individualized approach
  • E. Christopher Ellison

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.