Abbonarsi

Arthroscopic bone block stabilisation procedures for glenoid bone loss in anterior glenohumeral instability: A systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes - 24/08/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102949 
Muaaz Tahir a, , Shahbaz Malik b, Robert Jordan a, Madara Kronberga a, Peter D’Alessandro c, Adnan Saithna d
a Trauma and orthopaedic surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, B15 2TH Birmingham, UK 
b Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK 
c Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth, Australia 
d Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, MO, USA 

Corresponding author. Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, B15 2TH Birmingham, UK.Queen Elizabeth Hospital BirminghamMindelsohn WayBirminghamB15 2THUK

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Introduction

Recurrent shoulder instability is frequently associated with glenohumeral bone loss. Recently there has been a surge of interest in arthroscopically performed bone block procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic glenoid bone block stabilisation for recurrent anterior dislocation.

Methods

This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy was applied to MEDLINE and Embase databases on 20th July 2020. Studies reporting either clinical or radiological outcomes following arthroscopic bone block stabilisation for recurrent anterior dislocation were included. Primary outcomes were function and instability scores. Secondary outcomes included recurrent instability, graft union and resorption rates, return to activity/sports, and complications. Pooled analysis was performed when an outcome was uniformly reported by more than one study. Critical appraisal of studies was conducted using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

Results

Application of the search strategy resulted in the inclusion of 15 eligible studies; 12 used iliac crest bone graft while 3 used distal tibial allograft. The overall population comprised 265 patients (mean age range, 25.5–37.5 years; 79% of participants were men). All post-operative outcome scores were significantly improved, and the overall rate of recurrent instability was low (weighted mean 6.6%, range 0–18.2%) at mean follow up of 30.4 months. The Rowe score was the most frequently reported outcome measure, improving on average by 53.9 points at final follow-up, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Graft union rates ranged between 92–100% in 8 out of 10 studies at mean follow up range 6–78.7 months but two reported lower rates ranging from 58.3–84% for autografts and 37.5% for allografts. Graft resorption rates averaged between 10–16% for autografts and 32% for allografts. Hardware-related complications occurred in 2% with the most frequent being screw breakage or symptomatic mechanical irritation.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic bone block stabilisation is associated with high rates of graft union, significant improvements in the WOSI, Rowe, Constant and SSV scores (exceeding MCID thresholds where known), and a low rate of complications, including re-dislocation in the short to mid-term. Graft union rates were high, but the long-term implications of graft resorption (which occurs more frequently with allograft) are unknown. Longer follow-up of these patients and future experimental studies are required to further examine the effects of graft type and fixation methods.

Level of evidence

IV; systematic review.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Shoulder instability, Glenoid defect, Autograft, Allograft, Arthroscopic bone block procedure


Mappa


© 2021  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 107 - N° 5

Articolo 102949- settembre 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Anterior glenohumeral instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart operation – a retrospective 5-year follow-up study
  • Simo S.A. Miettinen, Tatu Kiljunen, Antti Joukainen
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Evaluation of the subscapularis split created with passive rotation during arthroscopic dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS): A cadaveric study
  • Mohamed Ibrahim, Pablo Narbona, Patrick J. Denard, Paolo Arrigoni, Philippe Collin, Alexandre Lädermann

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.