Abbonarsi

Intravenous oxytocin dosing regimens for postpartum hemorrhage prevention following cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis - 04/09/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.258 
Laura C. Phung, MD a, b, , Elise K. Farrington, MD a, b, Mairead Connolly, MD, MPH a, b, Alyce N. Wilson, MD, MPH a, c, Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, FRCA d, Caroline S.E. Homer, PhD a, Joshua P. Vogel, PhD a, c
a Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia 
b Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 
c School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 
d Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 

Corresponding author: Laura C. Phung, MD.

Abstract

Objective

To compare the available evidence on intravenous oxytocin dosing regimens for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage following cesarean delivery.

Data Sources

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Global Index Medicus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for eligible studies published until February 2020.

Study Eligibility Criteria

We included any randomized or nonrandomized study published in peer-reviewed journals that compared at least 2 different dosing regimens of intravenous oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage prevention in women undergoing cesarean delivery.

Methods

Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was incidence of postpartum hemorrhage ≥1000 mL. Other review outcomes included use of additional uterotonics, blood loss, and adverse maternal events. Data were analyzed according to the type of intravenous administration (bolus only, infusion only, or bolus plus infusion) and total oxytocin dose. A meta-analysis was performed on randomized trials and the results were reported as risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Findings from dose-finding trials and nonrandomized studies were reported narratively.

Results

A total of 35 studies (7333 women) met our inclusion criteria and included 30 randomized trials and 5 nonrandomized studies. There were limited data available from the trials for most outcomes, and the results were not conclusive. Compared with bolus plus infusion regimens, bolus only regimens probably result in slightly higher mean blood loss (mean difference, 52 mL; 95% confidence interval, 0.4–104 mL; moderate certainty). Among the bolus plus infusion regimens, initial bolus doses <5 IU may reduce nausea (risk ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.63; low certainty) when compared with doses of 5–9 IU. Total oxytocin doses of 5–9 IU vs total doses of 10–19 IU may increase the use of additional uterotonics (risk ratio, 13.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.75–96.37; low certainty). Effects on other outcomes were generally inconclusive.

Conclusion

There are limited data available for comparisons of IV oxytocin regimens for postpartum hemorrhage prevention following cesarean delivery. Bolus plus infusion regimens may lead to minor reductions in mean blood loss and initial bolus doses of <5 IU may minimize nausea. Bolus only regimens of 10 IU vs bolus only regimens of 5 IU may decrease the need for additional uterotonics, however, further comparative trials are required to understand the effects on other key outcomes, particularly hypotension.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : abdominal delivery, birth, blood loss, dosing, drug administration, pregnancy, uterine atony, uterotonics


Mappa


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This study received no financial support.


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 225 - N° 3

P. 250.e1-250.e38 - settembre 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Benjamin B. Albright, Karen A. Monuszko, Samantha J. Kaplan, Brittany A. Davidson, Haley A. Moss, Allan B. Huang, Alexander Melamed, Jason D. Wright, Laura J. Havrilesky, Rebecca A. Previs
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Medical and mental health implications of gestational surrogacy
  • Annie Yau, Rachel L. Friedlander, Allison Petrini, Mary Catherine Holt, Darrell E. White, Joseph Shin, Sital Kalantry, Steven Spandorfer

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.