Abbonarsi

Continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilation improve survival in a neonatal swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest - 09/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.009 
Afrodite Aggelina, MSc a, 1, Ioannis Pantazopoulos, MD, PhD b, 1, George Giokas, MD, PhD a, Athanasios Chalkias, MD, PhD c, Georgios Mavrovounis, MD b, , Apostolos Papalois, MD, PhD d, e , Alexandros Douvanas, MSc a, Theodoros Xanthos, MD, PhD e, Nicoletta Iacovidou, MD, PhD f, g
a National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 11527, Greece 
b University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 41110 Larissa, Greece 
c University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, 41110 Larissa, Greece 
d Experimental, Educational and Research Center ELPEN, Greece 
e European University Cyprus, School of Medicine, 1516, Cyprus 
f National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 11527, Greece 
g Department of Neonatology, Aretaieio Hospital, 11528, Greece 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

Guidelines for neonatal resuscitation recommend a 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio. However, this recommendation is based on expert opinion and consensus rather than strong scientific evidence. Our primary aim was to assess whether continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations would increase return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and survival compared to the 3:1 chest compression to ventilation ratio.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, laboratory study. Twenty male Landrace-Large White pigs, aged 1–4 days with an average weight 1.650 ± 228.3 g were asphyxiated and left untreated until heart rate was less than 60 bpm or mean arterial pressure was below 15 mmHg. Animals were then randomly assigned to receive either continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations (n = 10), or standard (3:1) chest compression to ventilation ratio (n = 10). Heart rate and arterial pressure were assessed every 30 s during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) until ROSC or asystole. All animals with ROSC were monitored for 4 h.

Results

Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) at 30 s of CPR was significantly higher in the experimental group (45.7 ± 16.9 vs. 21.8 ± 6 mmHg, p < 0.001) and remained significantly elevated throughout the experiment. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) was also significantly higher in the experimental group throughout the experiment (23.4 ± 5.6 vs. 14.7 ± 5.9 mmHg, p < 0.001). ROSC was observed in six (60%) animals treated with 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio and nine (90%) animals treated with continuous chest compressions and asynchronous ventilation (p = 0.30). Time to ROSC was significantly lower in the experimental group (30 (30−30) vs. 60 (60–60) sec, p = 0.021). Of note, 7 (77.8%) animals in the experimental group and 1 (16.7%) animal in the control group achieved ROSC after 30 s (0.02). At 4 h, 2 (20%) animals survived in the control group compared to 7 (70%) animals in the experimental group (p = 0.022).

Conclusion

Continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations significantly improved CPP, ETCO2, time to ROSC, ROSC at 30 s and survival in a porcine model of neonatal resuscitation.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Highlights

The compression to ventilation ratio in neonatal CPR is based on expert opinion.
Continuous chest compressions increased CPP and ETCO2 during neonatal CPR.
Continuous chest compressions increased time to ROSC and survival in our model.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Neonatal resuscitation, Asphyxial cardiac arrest, Continuous chest compressions, Survival, ROSC

Abbreviations : ILCOR, CPR, CPP, ROSC, FiO2, ETCO2, NLS, ABGs, IQR, ERC, HR, MAP, DAP, SAP


Mappa


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 48

P. 60-66 - ottobre 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Comparison of qSOFA, SIRS, and NEWS scoring systems for diagnosis, mortality, and morbidity of sepsis in emergency department
  • Ali Fuat Oduncu, Güçlü Selahattin K?yan, Sercan Yalç?nl?
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • How does the side of approach impact the force delivered during external chest compression?
  • Jui-Yi Tsou, Chia-Lung Kao, Ming-Yuan Hong, Chih-Jan Chang, Fong-Chin Su, Chih-Hsien Chi

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.