Abbonarsi

Prevalence of spatial neglect post-stroke: A systematic review - 12/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.10.010 
Emily Esposito a, Grigoriy Shekhtman b, c, Peii Chen b, d,
a Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, 900, University avenue, Riverside, CA, USA 
b Centre for Stroke Rehabilitation Research, Kessler Foundation, 1199, Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, USA 
c Department of Psychology, Seton Hall University, 400, South Orange avenue, South Orange, NJ, USA 
d Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, 183, South Orange avenue, Newark, NJ, USA 

Corresponding author at: Kessler Foundation, 1199, Pleasant Valley Way, 07052 West Orange, New Jersey, USA.Kessler Foundation1199, Pleasant Valley WayWest Orange, New Jersey07052USA

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Objective

Spatial neglect (SN) impedes stroke rehabilitation progress, slows functional recovery, and increases caregiver stress and burden. The estimation of SN prevalence varies widely across studies.

Background

We aimed to establish the prevalence of SN based on the injured cerebral hemisphere, recovery stage post-stroke, and diagnostic methodology.

Materials and methods

All journal articles published up to February 27, 2019 from CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. We selected original research articles that described observational studies, included both individuals with left brain damage (LBD) and those with right brain damage (RBD) post-stroke, and reported specific diagnostic methods for SN. All authors reached consensus for the final selection of 41 articles. Time post-stroke, patient selection criteria, study setting, SN diagnostic methods were extracted.

Results

A total of 6324 participants were included: 3411 (54%) with RBD and 2913 (46%) with LBD. Without considering time post-stroke or diagnostic methods, the occurrence rate of SN was 29% (38% after RBD and 18% after LBD). Using ecological assessments resulted in higher prevalence than using tests not directly related to daily life activities (53% vs. 24%). Using methods based on a single-cutoff criterion led to lower occurrence of SN than using multi-test methods (27% vs. 33%). The prevalence decreased from the acute to chronic stage post-stroke.

Conclusions

The estimated prevalence of SN after unilateral stroke is 30%. SN is more common after RBD than after LBD, but SN after LBD is still quite common. Using ecological assessments and multi-test methods to detect SN is preferred to using a single-cutoff criterion of a test that is not directly related to daily function. The decrease in SN prevalence over time is evident, but the exact prevalence in later stages cannot be estimated. More research is needed to better understand chronic SN.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Spatial neglect, Hemispatial neglect, Unilateral spatial neglect, Stroke, Right brain, Left brain


Mappa


© 2020  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 64 - N° 5

Articolo 101459- settembre 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Part 2. Consequences and predictors of poor self-awareness
  • Emilie Dromer, Lyes Kheloufi, Philippe Azouvi
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Feasibility of assessing post-stroke neglect with eye-tracking glasses during a locomotion task
  • Ana Flavia Gomes Paiva, Gregorio Sorrentino, Blaise Bignami, Claire Kemlin, Sofia Gueorguieva, Pascale Pradat-Diehl, Philippe Thoumie, Eleonore Bayen

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.