Abbonarsi

Concurrent asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adult ED patients: A national perspective - 29/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.081 
Michael W. Tsoulis a, , Brianne Navetta-Modrov b , Henry C. Thode c , Adam J. Singer c
a Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 
b Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 

Corresponding author at: Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University101 Nicolls RoadStony BrookNY11794USA

Abstract

Objectives

Emergency department (ED) visits for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are common. The designation of Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) has been used to describe patients with features of both diseases. Studies show that ACO patients may be at increased risk of poor outcomes relative to patients with either disease alone. We sought to characterize ED visits and ED-related outcomes of patients with ACO compared to patients with Asthma or COPD alone.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS, 2005–2018) characterizing ED visits in patients ≥35 years of age with Asthma Only, COPD Only or ACO. We performed univariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for demographics to assess relevant ED outcome variables.

Results

From 2005 to 2018, there were an estimated 8.15, 17.78 and 0.56 million ED visits for Asthma Only, COPD Only and ACO, respectively. ACO patients were younger than COPD Only patients (mean age 50.18 versus 61.79; p < 0.001). ACO patients differed in terms of sex, race and ethnicity from patients with either disease alone. When triaged, Asthma Only (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 11.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.20–109.38) patients were more likely to require immediate care than ACO patients. Although admission rates were comparable between groups, ACO patients had a decreased mean length of ED visit compared to both Asthma Only (p < 0.001) and COPD Only (p < 0.05) patients. COPD Only patients were less likely than ACO patients to be seen in the ED in the last 72 h (aOR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.056–0.89), receive nebulizer therapy (aOR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31–0.97), bronchodilators (aOR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12–0.48) and systemic corticosteroids (aOR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.091–0.35). Asthma Only patients were less likely than ACO patients to undergo any imaging (aOR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31–0.96) and receive antibiotics (aOR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23–0.93).

Conclusions

ACO patients appear to differ demographically from patients with either disease alone in the ED. After adjustment for these demographic differences, ACO patients appear to differ with respect to several ED variables, notably respiratory therapies; however, clinical outcomes including admission and mortality rates appear to be comparable between groups.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Highlights

Asthma-COPD overlap patients differed demographically from either disease alone.
ED experience of Asthma-COPD overlap patients differs from either disease alone.
Asthma-COPD overlap patients had similar clinical outcomes to either disease alone.
Asthma-COPD overlap patients were more likely to receive medications.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Asthma, COPD, Asthma-COPD overlap, Emergency department, Respiratory therapies, Healthcare utilization


Mappa


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 49

P. 216-225 - novembre 2021 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Characteristics of surfers as bystander rescuers in Europe
  • Ingvar Berg, Bart Haveman, Ognjen Markovic, Dion van de Schoot, Jeroen Dikken, Michael Goettinger, Amy E. Peden
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on treatment time for ectopic pregnancy
  • Bethsabee S. Stone, Krithika M. Muruganandan, Melinda M. Tonelli, Julianne N. Dugas, Ivy E. Verriet, Joseph R. Pare

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.