Abbonarsi

Comparative efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis - 09/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.010 
Antonio Facciorusso, MD, PhD 1, Daryl Ramai, MD, MSc 2, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, MD 3, Shahab R. Khan, MBBS 4, Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, MD, PhD 3, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, MD, PhD 5, Alberto Tringali, MD 6, Saurabh Chandan, MD 7, Babu P. Mohan, MD 8, Douglas G. Adler, MD 9,
1 Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy 
2 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA 
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium 
4 Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
5 Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ''Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece 
6 Endoscopy Unit, Conegliano Hospital Italy, Conegliano, Italy 
7 Gastroenterology Unit, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA 
8 Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA 
9 Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Porter Adventist Hospital/PEAK Gastroenterology, Denver, Colorado, USA 

Reprint requests: Douglas G. Adler, MD, FACG, AGAF, FASGE, Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Porter Adventist Hospital/PEAK Gastroenterology, 2525 South Downing St, Denver, CO 80210.Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE)Porter Adventist Hospital/PEAK Gastroenterology2525 South Downing StDenverCO80210

Abstract

Background and Aims

Several methods with variable efficacy have been proposed for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP. We assessed the comparative efficacy of different strategies for difficult biliary cannulation through a network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect treatment comparisons.

Methods

We identified 17 randomized controlled trials (2015 patients) that compared the efficacy of different adjunctive methods for difficult biliary cannulation (needle-knife techniques, pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique, pancreatic-assisted technique, and transpancreatic sphincterotomy) either with each other or with persistence with the standard cannulation techniques. The success rate of biliary cannulation and the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were the outcomes of interest. We performed pairwise and network meta-analysis for all treatments and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria to appraise quality of evidence.

Results

Low-quality evidence supported the use of transpancreatic sphincterotomy over persistence with standard cannulation techniques (risk ratio [RR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.59) and over any other adjunctive intervention (RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01-1.44] vs pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique, RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.01-1.43] vs early needle-knife techniques, RR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.03-2.10] vs pancreatic stent-assisted technique) for increasing the success rate of biliary cannulation. No other significant results were observed in any other comparisons. Based on the network model, transpancreatic sphincterotomy (P-score, .97) followed by early needle-knife techniques (P-score, .62) were ranked highest in terms of increasing the success rate of biliary cannulation. Early needle-knife techniques outperformed persistence with standard cannulation techniques in terms of decreasing PEP rate (RR, .61; 95% CI, .37-1.00), whereas both early needle-knife techniques and transpancreatic sphincterotomy led to lower PEP rates as compared with pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique (RR, .49 [95% CI, .23-.99] and .53 [95% CI, .30-.92], respectively).

Conclusions

Transpancreatic sphincterotomy increases the success rate of biliary cannulation as compared with persistence with the standard cannulation techniques. Early needle-knife techniques and transpancreatic sphincterotomy are superior to other interventions in decreasing PEP rates and should be considered in patients with difficult cannulation.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Graphical abstract




Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : CI, GRADE, PEP, RCT, RR, SUCRA


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships.
 See CME section, p. 171.


© 2022  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 95 - N° 1

P. 60 - gennaio 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Wide-area transepithelial sampling for dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • D. Chamil Codipilly, Apoorva Krishna Chandar, Kenneth K. Wang, David A. Katzka, John R. Goldblum, Prashanthi N. Thota, Gary W. Falk, Amitabh Chak, Prasad G. Iyer
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for postendoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in the stomach: a multicenter population-based comparative study
  • Yasutoshi Shiratori, Ryota Niikura, Naoki Ishii, Takashi Ikeya, Tetsuro Honda, Kenkei Hasatani, Naohiro Yoshida, Tsutomu Nishida, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Shu Kiyotoki, Masahiro Arai, Takashi Kawai, Katsuyuki Fukuda

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.