Abbonarsi

Symptom Resolution and Recurrent Urinary Incontinence Following Removal of Painful Midurethral Slings - 10/01/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.024 
Jiping Zeng a, Andrew Bergersen a, Elinora Price a, Michael Callegari b, Evan Austin a, Odutoyosi Oduyemi a, Kristi Poling a, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu c, Joel Funk a, Christian Twiss a,
a Department of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona 
b Department of Urology, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 
c Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona 

Address correspondence to: Christian Twiss, M.D., FACS, Department of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245077, Tucson, AZ 85724-5077.Department of UrologyUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine1501 N. Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245077TucsonAZ85724-5077

ABSTRACT

Objective

To evaluate pain improvement and recurrent stress incontinence (SUI) following painful synthetic midurethral sling (MUS) removal.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent synthetic MUS removal at our institution from 2009–2016 for the indication of pain. We recorded sling type (transobturator vs retropubic), complete vs partial removal, and presenting symptoms. Postoperative pain improvement was categorized as resolved (pain resolved, requiring no further therapy), improved (pain less bothersome, may require further therapy), or unresolved (no/minimal improvement, requiring further management). Recurrent incontinence and further reconstructive procedures were assessed.

Results

87 patients (49 complete and 38 partial removal) with pain as the primary indication for removal were included. Median age at intervention was 54 years with median follow-up of 8 months. Overall, pain improved or resolved in 78.1% of cases. Complete removal was associated with significantly greater percentage of pain resolution (63.3%) compared to partial removal (26.3%) (P = 0.002) regardless of sling type. No significant differences in recurrent SUI were noted in complete vs partial removal. Additional reconstructive procedures were performed in 28 patients, most commonly sling placement, with no significant difference in complete (20.4%) vs partial (28.9%) removal groups (P = 0.36). The overall complication rate was low (5.7%), a majority of which were transfusions (4.6%).

Conclusion

Following MUS removal, most patients experienced resolution or improvement of pain. Complete sling removal was associated with significantly greater percentage of pain resolution compared to partial removal in both retropubic and transobturator slings. Rates of recurrent SUI and reintervention for SUI were not related to the extent of sling removal.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 This study received approval from the University of Arizona Institutional Review Board.


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 159

P. 78-82 - gennaio 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The Association of Physical Activity and Urinary Incontinence in US Women: Results from a Multi-Year National Survey
  • Michelle M. Kim, Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian, David A. Ginsberg, Evgeniy I. Kreydin
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Whole Exome Sequencing Identifies a Rare Mutation in NACAD as a Possible Cause of COVID Orchitis in Brothers
  • Rohit Reddy, Iakov Efimenko, Willy Chertman, Taylor Kohn, Parris Diaz, Deepa Seetharam, Kajal Khodamoradi, Eliyahu Kresch, Ranjith Ramasamy

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.