Abbonarsi

Association between emergency department modifiable risk factors and subsequent delirium among hospitalized older adults - 11/02/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.032 
Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva, MD MS a, Jessica A. Stanich, MD a, Molly M. Jeffery, PhD a, b, Heidi L. Lindroth, PhD, RN c, Donna M. Miller, MD d, e, Ronna L. Campbell, MD, PhD a, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, MD f, Robert J. Pignolo, MD PhD e, Fernanda Bellolio, MD MS a, b,
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States 
b Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States 
c Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States 
d Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States 
e Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States 
f Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.Department of Emergency MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMNUnited States

Abstract

Study objective

To evaluate the association between potential emergency department (ED)-based modifiable risk factors and subsequent development of delirium among hospitalized older adults free of delirium at the time of ED stay.

Methods

Observational cohort study of patients aged ≥75 years who screened negative for delirium in the ED, were subsequently admitted to the hospital, and had delirium screening performed within 48 h of admission. Potential ED-based risk factors for delirium included ED length of stay (LOS), administration of opioids, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, or anticholinergics, and the placement of urinary catheter while in the ED. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

Among 472 patients without delirium in the ED (mean age 84 years, 54.2% females), 33 (7.0%) patients developed delirium within 48 h of hospitalization. The ED LOS of those who developed delirium was similar to those who did not develop delirium (312.1 vs 325.6 min, MD -13.5 min, CI -56.1 to 29.0). Patients who received opioids in the ED were as likely to develop delirium as those who did not receive opioids (7.2% vs 6.9%: OR 1.04, CI 0.44 to 2.48). Patients who received benzodiazepines had a higher risk of incident delirium, the difference was clinically but not statistically significant (37.3% vs 6.5%, OR 5.35, CI 0.87 to 23.81). Intermittent urinary catheterization (OR 2.05, CI 1.00 to 4.22) and Foley placement (OR 3.69, CI 1.55 to 8.80) were associated with a higher risk of subsequent delirium. After adjusting for presence of dementia, only Foley placement in the ED remained significantly associated with development of in-hospital delirium (adjusted OR 3.16, CI 1.22 to 7.53).

Conclusion

ED LOS and ED opioid use were not associated with higher risk of incident delirium in this cohort. Urinary catheterization in the ED was associated with an increased risk of subsequent delirium. These findings can be used to design ED-based initiatives and increase delirium prevention efforts.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Delirium, Acute brain failure, Geriatric emergency medicine, Geriatrics, Older adults


Mappa


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 53

P. 201-207 - marzo 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Secondary asthma prevention measures are not adequately addressed prior to emergency department discharge!
  • Marlize Swart, Abdullah E. Laher
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Utility of bedside assessment to evaluate for cervical-spine fracture post ground-level fall for patients 65 years and older
  • Jeremy R. Williams, Aaron J. Muesch, James E. Svenson, Alexander W. Clegg, Brian W. Patterson, Michael A. Ward

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.