Remote dielectric sensing for detecting pulmonary edema in the emergency department - 15/04/22
, Robert McArthur, MD, Navdeep Sekhon, MD, Heba Mesbah, MD, PhD, Abeer Almasary, MBBS, W. Frank Peacock, MDAbstract |
Background |
Dyspnea is a common Emergency Department (ED) complaint of which acute pulmonary edema (APE) is a potentially life-threatening etiology. Remote Dielectric Sensing (ReDS™) is a novel, non-invasive, radar based, rapid, point of care vest testing system used to objectively quantify lung fluid content and may be useful in the early diagnosis of APE.
Objective |
To determine the accuracy of ReDS to detect pathologic lung fluid in ED undifferentiated dyspneic patients.
Methods |
We performed a prospective convenience sample observation pilot study enrolling adult ED patients with a chief complaint of “shortness of breath.” After informed consent, patients were fitted with the ReDS vest and a reading, blinded to the care team, was recorded. A gold standard diagnosis of pulmonary edema, determined by 2 physicians performing a chart review and blinded to ReDs data, was compared to the ReDS reading.
Results |
Overall, 123 patients were included; 59% (n = 73) were male, mean (SD) age 57.2 (±12) years, 46.3% (n = 57) Hispanic, 34.1%(n = 42) African American, 13.0% (n = 16) Caucasian and 5.7% (n = 7) Asian. The gold standard diagnosis showed pulmonary edema in 38 (30.9%) patients, of which 30 were detected by ReDS. At an optimal cutoff (≥ 37%), ReDS had a Sn of 79.5% (CI 63.5% - 90.5%), Sp of 72.6% (CI 61.8% - 81.8%), a PPV of 57.4% and a NPV of 88.4%.
Conclusions |
ReDS is moderately sensitive and specific with an accuracy of 74.8% for pulmonary edema.
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Keywords : Remote dielectric sensing, ReDS, Pulmonary edema, Dyspnea
Mappa
Vol 55
P. 11-15 - maggio 2022 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
