Abbonarsi

A prospective observational study evaluating the use of remote patient monitoring in ED discharged COVID-19 patients in NYC - 15/04/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.035 
Seung Mi Oh, BS a, Singh Nair, PhD a, b, Alexander Casler, MD b, Diana Nguyen, BS a, Juan Pablo Forero, BS a, Celina Joco, BS b, Jason Kubert, MD d, David Esses, MD a, b, David Adams, MD a, b, Sunit Jariwala, MD c, Jonathan Leff, MD a, b,
a Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA 
b Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA 
c Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA 
d Emergency Department, Northern Dutchess Hospital, Rhinebeck, NY 12572, USA 

Corresponding author at: Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467-2401, USA.Montefiore Medical Center111 East 210th StreetBronxNY10467-2401USA

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Abstract

Objectives

We investigated whether continuous remote patient monitoring (RPM) could significantly reduce return Emergency Department (ED) revisits among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients discharged from the emergency Department.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study was conducted from a total of 2833 COVID-19 diagnosed patients who presented to the Montefiore Medical Center ED between September 2020–March 2021. Study patients were remotely monitored through a digital platform that was supervised 24/7 by licensed healthcare professionals. Age and time-period matched controls were randomly sampled through retrospective review. The primary outcome was ED revisit rates among the two groups.

Results

In our study, 150 patients enrolled in the RPM program and 150 controls were sampled for a total of 300 patients. Overall, 59.1% of the patients identified as Hispanic/Latino. The RPM group had higher body mass index (BMI) (29 (25–35) vs. 27 (25–31) p-value 0.020) and rates of hypertension (50.7% (76) vs. 35.8% (54) p-value 0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of ED revisit between the RPM group (8% (12)) and control group (9.3% (14)) (OR: 0.863; 95% CI:0.413–1. 803; p- 0.695).

Discussion and conclusion

Our study explored the impact of continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring for reducing ED revisits in a largely underrepresented population of the Bronx. Our study demonstrated that continuous remote patient monitoring showed no significant difference in preventing ED revisits compared to non-standardized intermittent monitoring. However, potential other acute care settings where RPM may be useful for identifying high-risk patients for early interventions warrant further study.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Remote patient monitoring, COVID-19, Emergency department, Hypoxia


Mappa


© 2022  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 55

P. 64-71 - maggio 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Evaluation of changes in physician behavior after introduction of pediatric syncope approach protocol in the emergency department
  • Leman Akcan Yildiz, Goknur Haliloglu, Dilek Yalnizoglu, Ilker Ertugrul, Dursun Alehan, Ozlem Teksam
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Prospective study of haloperidol plus lorazepam versus droperidol plus midazolam for the treatment of acute agitation in the emergency department
  • Pauline Thiemann, David Roy, Martin Huecker, Joshua Senn, Jessica Javed, Alyssa Thomas, Jacob Shreffler, Isaac Shaw

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.