Abbonarsi

Setting up a regional expert panel for complex colorectal polyps - 14/06/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.003 
Liselotte W. Zwager, MD, Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen, MD, Evelien Dekker, MD, PhD, Paul Fockens, MD, PhD
on behalf of the

Expert Panel Group

  See Acknowledgment for members of the Expert Panel Group.
M.I.E. Appels, G.J. de Bruin, A.C.T.M. Depla, I.L. Huibregtse, T. Kuiper, B.I. Liberov, R. Ch. Mallant-Hent, W.A. Marsman, D. Ramsoekh, B.W. van der Spek, M.S. Vlug, S.J.B. van Weyenberg, C.A. Wientjes

 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 

Reprint requests: Paul Fockens, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam Gastroenterology & MetabolismAmsterdam University Medical CentersUniversity of AmsterdamMeibergdreef 9Amsterdam1105 AZThe Netherlands

Abstract

Background and Aims

Advanced endoscopic resection techniques for complex colorectal polyps have evolved significantly over the past decade, leading to a management shift from surgical to endoscopic resection as the preferred treatment. However, in practice, interhospital consultation and appropriate referral management remain challenging, leading to unnecessary surgical resections. To support regional care for patients with complex colorectal polyps, facilitate peer consultations, and lower thresholds for referrals, an expert panel consultation platform was initiated in the northwestern region of the Netherlands.

Methods

We initiated a regional expert panel in the northwestern region of the Netherlands for patients with complex colorectal polyps and studied the implementation, adaption, and clinical impact. All panel consultations between June 2019 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, and user satisfaction among panel members was evaluated.

Results

Eighty-eight patients with complex colorectal polyps from 11 of 15 participating centers (73.3%) were discussed in our panel. The most common reason for panel consultation was suspicion of invasive cancer in 36.4% (n = 32). After panel consultation, 43.2% of the consulting endoscopists (n = 38) changed their initial treatment strategy, and in 63.6% (n = 56) patients were referred to another endoscopy center. Of 26 cases submitted with a primary proposal for surgical treatment, surgery was avoided in 7 (26.9%). User satisfaction was rated high in most participating centers (91.7%).

Conclusions

Our study shows that implementation of and consultation with a regional expert panel can be a valuable tool for endoscopists to guide and optimize treatment of complex colorectal polyps and facilitate interhospital referrals in a regional network.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Graphical abstract




Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : CRC, eFTR, ESD, SMSA


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed financial relationships: B. A. J. Bastiaansen: Speaker for Olympus, Tillotts Pharma AG, and Ovesco Endoscopy. E. Dekker: Research support and equipment loan from FujiFilm; consultant for FujiFilm, Olympus,Tillotts PharmaAG, GI Supply, CPP-FAP, and PAION; speaker for Olympus, Roche, GI Supply, Ambu, and Ipsen. P. Fockens: Consultant for Cook, Ethicon, and Olympus; research support fromBoston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Fockens at p.fockens@amsterdamumc.nl.


© 2022  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 96 - N° 1

P. 84 - luglio 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Reproducibility of the electronic chromoendoscopy PICaSSO score (Paddington International Virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre) in ulcerative colitis using multiple endoscopic platforms: a prospective multicenter international study (with video)
  • Rosanna Cannatelli, Alina Bazarova, Federica Furfaro, Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi, Davide Zardo, Olga Maria Nardone, Paola Spaggiari, Vincenzo Villanacci, Moris Cadei, Nunzia Labarile, Samuel Charles Lloyd Smith, Silvio Danese, Subrata Ghosh, Marietta Iacucci
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Second opinions foster better outcomes
  • Ian Grimm, Daniel Kroch

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.