Abbonarsi

A Prospective, Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Structural Heart Disease Related Ventricular Tachycardia: The CAAD-VT Trial Protocol - 28/02/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.09.006 

CAAD-VT investigators;

Richard G. Bennett, BSc, MBChB a, Timothy Campbell, BSc a, Kartheek Garikapati, MBBS a, Yasuhito Kotake, MD, PhD a, Samual Turnbull, BSc a, Juliana Kanawati, MBBS a, Mary S. Wong, PhD a, Pierre Qian, MBBS, PhD b, Stuart P. Thomas, PhD c, Clara K. Chow, MBBS, PhD a, Pramesh Kovoor, MBBS, PhD c, A. Robert Denniss, MD, MSc b, William Chik, MBBS, PhD c, Simone Marschner, BSc, MSc d, Peter Kistler, MBBS, PhD e, Haris Haqqani, MBBS, PhD f, Matthew Rowe, BSc, MBBS g, Aleksandr Voskoboinik, MBBS, PhD e, Geoffrey Lee, MBChB, PhD h, Nicholas Jackson, MBBS, FRACP i, Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD j, Kurt Roberts-Thomson, MBBS, PhD j, Kim Hoe Chan, MBBS, PhD k, Raymond Sy, MBBS, PhD k, Rajeev Pathak, MBBS, PhD l, Logan Kanagaratnam, MBBS, DDU m, Karin Chia, MBBS, PhD m, Ihab El-Sokkari, MBBCh, MMed n, Hisham Hallani, MBBS n, Ajita Kanthan, MBBS, PhD o, David Burgess, MPH, PhD o, Saurabh Kumar, BSc(Med)/MBBS, PhD a,
a Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
b Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
c Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
d Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
e Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
f Department of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 
g Department of Cardiology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 
h Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia 
i Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia 
j Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia 
k Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
l Department of Cardiology, Canberra Hospital, ACT, Australia 
m Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
n Department of Cardiology, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
o Department of Cardiology, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Associate Professor Saurabh Kumar, Cardiology Department, Westmead Hospital, Corner Hawkesbury and Darcy Roads, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, AustraliaCardiology DepartmentWestmead HospitalCorner Hawkesbury and Darcy RoadsWestmeadNew South Wales2145Australia

Abstract

Importance

Randomised trials have shown that catheter ablation (CA) is superior to medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) largely in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Whether this translates to patients with all forms and stages of structural heart disease (SHD—e.g., non-ischaemic heart disease) is unclear. This trial will help clarify whether catheter ablation offers superior outcomes compared to medical therapy for VT in all patients with SHD.

Objective

To determine in patients with SHD and spontaneous or inducible VT, if catheter ablation is more efficacious than medical therapy in control of VT during follow-up.

Design

Randomised controlled trial including 162 patients, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and geographical region of site, with a median follow-up of 18-months and a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

Setting

Multicentre study performed in centres across Australia.

Participants

Structural heart disease patients with sustained VT or inducible VT (n=162).

Intervention

Early treatment, within 30 days of randomisation, with catheter ablation (intervention) or initial treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs only (control).

Main outcomes, measures, and results

Primary endpoint will be a composite of recurrent VT, VT storm (≥3 VT episodes in 24 hrs or incessant VT), or death. Secondary outcomes will include each of the individual primary endpoints, VT burden (number of VT episodes in the 6 months preceding intervention compared to the 6 months after intervention), cardiovascular hospitalisation, mortality (including all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and non-cardiac death) and LVEF (assessed by transthoracic echocardiography from baseline to 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-months post intervention).

Conclusions and Relevance

The Catheter Ablation versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Ventricular Tachycardia (CAAD-VT) trial will help determine whether catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone, in patients with SHD-related VT.

Trial Registry

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)

Trial Registration ID

ACTRN12620000045910

Trial Registration URL

TrialReview.aspx?id=377617&isReview=true

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Catheter ablation, Antiarrhythmic drugs, Ventricular tachycardia, Ventricular arrhythmia, Structural heart disease


Mappa


© 2022  Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 32 - N° 2

P. 184-196 - febbraio 2023 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Prognostic Significance of Nonobstructive Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With and Without Diabetes: Long-Term Outcomes From the CONFIRM Registry
  • Juhwan Lee, Kashif Shaikh, Rine Nakanishi, Heidi Gransar, Stephan Achenbach, Mouaz H. Al-Mallah, Daniele Andreini, Jeroen J. Bax, Daniel S. Berman, Filippo Cademartiri, Tracy Q. Callister, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Kavitha Chinnaiyan, Benjamin J.W. Chow, Ricardo C. Cury, Augustin DeLago, Gudrun Feuchtner, Martin Hadamitzky, Joerg Hausleiter, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Yong-Jin Kim, Jonathon A. Leipsic, Erica Maffei, Hugo Marques, Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves, Gianluca Pontone, Ronen Rubinshtein, Todd C. Villines, Yao Lu, Jessica M. Peña, Fay Y. Lin, James K. Min, Leslee J. Shaw, Matthew J. Budoff
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Novel Epicardial Access Technique Facilitated by Carbon Dioxide Insufflation of the Pericardium for Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Lessons From the Early Experience From a Single Centre in Australia
  • Fang Shawn Foo, Raymond W. Sy, Paolo D’Ambrosio, Luis Quininir, Joanne Irons, John Silberbauer, Kim H. Chan

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.