Abbonarsi

Artificial intelligence algorithms aimed at characterizing or detecting prostate cancer on MRI: How accurate are they when tested on independent cohorts? – A systematic review - 29/04/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.diii.2022.11.005 
Olivier Rouvière a, b, c, , Tristan Jaouen c, Pierre Baseilhac a, Mohammed Lamine Benomar c, d, Raphael Escande a, Sébastien Crouzet b, c, e, Rémi Souchon c
a Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Department of Vascular and Urinary Imaging, Lyon 69003, France 
b Université Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Lyon 69003, France 
c LabTAU, INSERM, U1032, Lyon 69003, France 
d University of Ain Temouchent, Faculty of Science and Technology, Algeria 
e Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Department of Urology, Lyon 69003, France 

Corresponding author:

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Highlights

Five independency domains to better characterize the test cohorts used for assessing artificial intelligence-based algorithms in prostate MRI were defined including institution, MRI vendor, magnetic field strength, population, and period of acquisition.
Most algorithms provide good results in test cohorts, challenging those obtained by human reading.
Using predefined diagnostic thresholds, robust results were obtained with algorithms aimed at characterizing regions-of-interests defined by human readers.
Predefined diagnostic thresholds yielded variable results for algorithms aimed at both detecting and characterizing lesions.
Conflicting results were obtained by studies assessing unassisted and assisted prostate MRI reading.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the diagnostic performance, in independent test cohorts, of artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms aimed at characterizing/detecting prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and methods

Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2018 and September 2022, using a histological reference standard, and assessing prostate cancer characterization/detection by AI-based MRI algorithms in test cohorts composed of more than 40 patients and with at least one of the following independency criteria as compared to the training cohort: different institution, different population type, different MRI vendor, different magnetic field strength or strict temporal splitting.

Results

Thirty-five studies were selected. The overall risk of bias was low. However, 23 studies did not use predefined diagnostic thresholds, which may have optimistically biased the results. Test cohorts fulfilled one to three of the five independency criteria. The diagnostic performance of the algorithms used as standalones was good, challenging that of human reading. In the 12 studies with predefined diagnostic thresholds, radiomics-based computer-aided diagnosis systems (assessing regions-of-interest drawn by the radiologist) tended to provide more robust results than deep learning-based computer-aided detection systems (providing probability maps). Two of the six studies comparing unassisted and assisted reading showed significant improvement due to the algorithm, mostly by reducing false positive findings.

Conclusion

Prostate MRI AI-based algorithms showed promising results, especially for the relatively simple task of characterizing predefined lesions. The best management of discrepancies between human reading and algorithm findings still needs to be defined.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Artificial intelligence, Magnetic resonance imaging, Prostatic neoplasms, Systematic review

List of abbreviations : AI, AUC, CADe, CADx, CADp, csPCa, DCE, DSC, ISUP, MRI, PCa, PI-RADS, PZ, TZ


Mappa


© 2022  Société française de radiologie. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 104 - N° 5

P. 221-234 - maggio 2023 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: Imaging appearances, pitfalls and diagnostic algorithms
  • Amandine Crombé, Michèle Kind, David Fadli, Marco Miceli, Pierre-Antoine Linck, Giuseppe Bianchi, Andrea Sambri, Paolo Spinnato
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Bicolor K-edge spectral photon-counting CT imaging for the diagnosis of thoracic endoleaks: A dynamic phantom study
  • Benoit Cosset, Monica Sigovan, Sara Boccalini, Fadi Farhat, Philippe Douek, Loic Boussel, Salim Aymeric Si-Mohamed

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.