Abbonarsi

EUS-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stents for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective bicentric randomized controlled trial - 17/05/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2022.12.026 
Petr Vanek, MD 1, Premysl Falt, MD, PhD 1, ⁎, Petr Vitek, MD, PhD, MBA 2, 3, Vincent Zoundjiekpon, MD 1, Monika Horinkova, MD 1, Jana Zapletalova, MSc 4, Martin Lovecek, MD, PhD 5, Ondrej Urban, MD, PhD 1
1 Department of Internal Medicine II–Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic 
5 Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic 
2 Beskydske Gastrocentrum, Frydek-Mistek Hospital, Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic 
3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic 
4 Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic 

∗ Reprint requests: Premysl Falt, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine II–Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 185/6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic. Department of Internal Medicine II–Gastroenterology and Geriatrics University Hospital Olomouc I.P. Pavlova 185/6 Olomouc 77900 Czech Republic

Abstract

Background and Aims

Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have proven to be effective for drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), although associated adverse events (AEs) have been reported. Anchoring coaxial double-pigtail plastic stents (DPSs) within LAMSs have been proposed to prevent LAMS-related AEs but have not been assessed in prospective studies. We aimed to evaluate the utility of such measures with a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

We randomly assigned consecutive patients with WON indications for drainage to EUS-guided transluminal drainage using LAMSs with (group A) or without (group B) DPSs. All LAMSs were to be removed after 3 weeks had elapsed from the index procedure with a preceding CT to decide whether additional steps needed to be taken (eg, transluminal necrosectomy or placing transluminal plastic stents in patients with incomplete resolution of WON). The main outcomes were failure of the index method, defined as necessity of reintervention (endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical) before LAMS removal because of LAMS-related AEs and/or clinical deterioration; AE rates; and mortality with the LAMS in place. Variables were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ 2 test, or Fisher exact test as appropriate. P   < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Sixty-seven patients (37.3% women; mean age, 54 ± 14.4 years) underwent LAMS placement with (n = 34) or without (n = 33) DPS placement in 2 tertiary centers. Baseline characteristics including demographics, etiology, comorbidity, and clinical presentation (sterile vs infected necrosis) were comparable between both groups. The technical success rate in placing LAMSs and DPSs was 100%. The global rate of AEs was significantly lower in group A versus group B (20.7% vs 51.5%, respectively; P  = .008). Stent occlusion was the most frequently observed AE (14.7% vs 36.3%, P  = .042). Failure of the index method was lower in group A versus group B (29.4% vs 48.5%, respectively; P  = .109); however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The same applied to the mortality rate with LAMSs in place (2.9% vs 12.1%, P  = .197).

Conclusions

The addition of a coaxial DPS within a LAMS was associated with a significantly lower global rate of AEs and stent occlusion rate in EUS-guided drainage of WON. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03923686.)

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Graphical abstract




Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : AE, DPS, ETD, ETN, LAMS, PFC, PS, RCT, WON


Mappa


  DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships. Research support for this study was provided to Petr Vanek, Premysl Falt, Vincent Zoundjiekpon, and Ondrej Urban, by the Palacky University Olomouc (Student Grant IGA_LF_2022_009 ).


© 2023  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 97 - N° 6

P. 1070-1080 - giugno 2023 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Prevention of post-endscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Do we practice what we preach?
  • Stuart R. Gordon
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Double-pigtail stents through lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis: a simple step of uncertain benefit
  • Edoardo Troncone, Manuel Perez-Miranda

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.