Abbonarsi

Consecutive Experience with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in a High-Volume Australian Centre - 05/09/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.04.293 
Robert J. Puchalski, MBBS a, Russell A. Denman, MBBS a, Haris M. Haqqani, MBBS, PhD a, b, Vincent R. Deen, MBBS a, c,
a Department of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 
b Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 
c Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Dr Vincent Deen, Department of Cardiology, Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, Qld 4032, AustraliaDepartment of CardiologyPrince Charles Hospital627 Rode RoadChermsideQld4032Australia

Abstract

Introduction

Left-bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a relatively new technique for conduction system pacing. Australian safety and efficacy data is currently lacking. We aim to evaluate the learning curve, medium-term safety, and lead performance in a high-volume Australian setting.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 consecutive LBBAP procedures performed by a single operator at two centres between January 2019 and May 2020. Left bundle branch area pacing was performed predominantly via left subclavian access using a 69 cm Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 pacing lead and a preformed non-steerable C315-His sheath. Procedural success was defined as evidence of left septal or left bundle branch area capture as evidenced by a right bundle branch block-like paced morphology. Procedural characteristics, and follow-up (including lead performance) data were collected. Procedural efficiency over time, as well as safety data, were collected.

Results

Median age was 78.26 years (interquartile range [IQR] 71–85), 37% were female. Atrial fibrillation was present in 22%. The left ventricular ejection fraction <50% in 24%, atrioventricular (AV) block was present in 43.5%, left bundle branch block in 22.5% and right bundle branch block in 24.5%. Acute procedural success was 91.5%. Implant threshold was 0.6V @ 0.5 ms, and 0.75V @ 0.5 ms at 11.9 months of follow-up. The QRS was significant reduced (baseline 134 ms vs implant 114 ms, p<0.001) There was a reduction in procedural time and X-ray dose over the course of the study. There were no complications specific to LBBAP.

Conclusion

LBBAP appears to be a safe and effective pacing strategy. The QRS duration was significantly reduced compared to baseline. There appears to be an early learning curve with LBBAP.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Left bundle branch area pacing, Conduction system pacing, Pacing, LBBAP


Mappa


© 2023  Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 32 - N° 8

P. 993-999 - agosto 2023 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Storm After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Form of ‘Angry Purkinje Syndrome’
  • Jeremy William, Jack Shembrey, Edward Quine, Mark Perrin, Daryl Ridley, Ramanathan Parameswaran, Peter M. Kistler, Aleksandr Voskoboinik
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Stroke Recurrence in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Without Atrial Fibrillation on Invasive Cardiac Monitoring
  • Eugene S.J. Tan, Jhobeleen de Leon, Elaine Boey, Howe-Keat Chin, Kian-Hui Ho, Shana Aguirre, Ming-Gin Sim, Swee-Chong Seow, Vijay K. Sharma, Pipin Kojodjojo

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.