Abbonarsi

Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks - 19/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.025 
Maria J. Mathew a, Pankaj Kundra, M.D b, Stalin Vinayagam, M.D b,
a Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605006, India 
b Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605006, India 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by rescuers wearing well-sealed respirators such as N95 masks, was associated with significant reduction in the chest compression rate and depth. This was attributed to fatigue during the standard 2-min rescuer rotations. We hypothesized that in such situations, rotating rescuers every one minute, instead of the standard two minutes would improve CPR quality.

Aim

To compare the quality of chest compressions when rescuers wearing N95 masks are rotated every one minute, instead of the standard practice of two-minute rotations.

Methods

A randomized, controlled, crossover trial was conducted, with the approval of the institutional Ethics Committee. Medical students who volunteered as rescuers were trained to perform high-quality chest compressions on a manikin, and then randomly allocated into pairs. Each pair was randomized to one of two trial groups viz. one-minute rotations crossed-over to two-minute rotations; and vice versa. Thus, each pair performed CPR with one-minute rotations, as well as two-minute rotations Each CPR session included chest compressions for a duration of 12 min. The outcome parameters included CPR quality, compression depth, compression rate, and chest compression fraction. Rescuer fatigue was measured before and after each study session using the modified Borg scale.

Results

Fifty-six participants completed the study. The overall CPR quality was statistically similar in the study arms (median 88% vs. 81%, p = 0.09). However, the minute-to-minute inter-arm comparison revealed significantly lower CPR quality in the 2-min rotation arm, at the end of minutes 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 (respective p-values 0.03, 0.001, 0.008, 0.02, 0.002). A similar trend was observed in compression depth also. Rescuer fatigue score was significantly less with 1-min rotations compared to 2-min rotations (p < 0.001). Rescuer vital signs and cardiorespiratory parameters were not different with the two types of rotations.

Conclusion

During CPR performed by rescuers wearing N95 masks, the quality of CPR appears to be superior with rescuers rotating at 1-min instead of 2-min intervals. More frequent rotation was also associated with less rescuer fatigue.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Highlights

Cross-over RCT compared 1-min vs. 2-min rotation of CPR rescuers wearing N95 masks.
CPR quality was lower during every 2nd minute, with 2-min rescuer rotations.
CPR quality was better preserved throughout when rescuers rotated every minute.
Rescuer fatigue was significantly less during the 1-min rotations.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Chest compressions, Manikin study, Rescuer rotations

Abbreviations : COVID-19, CPR, PPE, RCT


Mappa


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 76

P. 75-81 - febbraio 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Video-stylet vs. channeled hyperangulated videolaryngoscope: Efficacy in simulated Ludwig's angina randomized cadaver trial
  • Tzu-Yao Hung, Cheng-Wei Tseng, Chung-Shiung Wen, Sheng-Han Yu, Hsin-Ling Chen, Chen-Wei Lee, Yung-Cheng Su, Chieh-Hung Lin
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Introduction of a high sensitivity troponin reduces ED length of stay
  • Adam J. Singer, Samita Heslin, Hal Skopicki, Chen On, Lisa B. Senzel, Mathew Tharakan, Henry C. Thode, Frank Peacock

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.