Abbonarsi

Boostability after single-visit pre-exposure prophylaxis with rabies vaccine: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial - 25/01/24

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00452-8 
Lisanne A Overduin, BSc a, , Jan Pieter R Koopman, MD a, , Corine Prins, BSc a, Petra H Verbeek-Menken, BSc a, Cornelis A De Pijper, PhD b, Phaedra L Eblé, PhD c, Fiona Heerink, MD a, Perry J J van Genderen, PhD d, Martin P Grobusch, ProfPhD b, Leo G Visser, Prof a,
a Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands 
b Centre for Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands 
c Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands 
d Corporate Travel Clinic, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands 

* Correspondence to: Prof Leo G Visser, Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden 2333, Netherlands Department of Infectious Diseases Leiden University Centre for Infectious Diseases Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden 2333 Netherlands

Summary

Background

After rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) vaccination, scarcely available rabies immunoglobulins are not required for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). However, PrEP is not sufficiently accessible as it is cost-intensive and time-intensive. This study investigates whether rabies PrEP schedules can be shortened to one visit, removing some of these barriers.

Methods

In a block-randomised (2:2:2:1) controlled, multicentre non-inferiority trial, healthy adult travellers (aged 18–50 years and >50 years) were randomly assigned to (A) single-visit intramuscular (1·0 mL); (B) single-visit intradermal (0·2 mL); (C) standard two-visit intramuscular (1·0 mL; day 0 and 7) PrEP; or (D) no rabies vaccination. 6 months later, participants received simulated intramuscular rabies PEP (1·0 mL; day 0 and 3). Rabies virus neutralising antibody (RVNA) concentrations were measured repeatedly. The primary outcome was the fold increase in geometric mean RVNA concentrations between day 0 and 7 after simulated PEP for all participants. The two main comparisons of this primary outcome are between the standard two-visit schedule and the one-visit intramuscular schedule, and between the standard two-visit schedule and the one-visit intradermal schedule. The non-inferiority margin was 0·67. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2017-000089-31.

Findings

Between May 16, 2018, and March 26, 2020, 288 healthy adult travellers were randomly assigned and 214 participants were evaluated for the primary outcome. Single-visit intramuscular rabies PrEP induced an anamnestic antibody response non-inferior compared with the two-visit intramuscular schedule; single-visit intradermal PrEP did not. The fold increases in the single-visit intramuscular and the single-visit intradermal schedule were 2·32 (95% CI [1·43–3·77]) and 1·11 (0·66–1·87) times as high as the fold increase in the standard schedule, respectively. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were observed. Adverse events related to vaccination were mostly mild.

Interpretation

Single intramuscular rabies vaccination can effectively prime travellers (aged 18–50 years), and potentially other populations, and could replace current standard two-visit rabies vaccination as PrEP.

Funding

ZonMW.

Translation

For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2024  Elsevier Ltd. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 24 - N° 2

P. 206-216 - febbraio 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Efficacy and safety of moxidectin compared with ivermectin against Strongyloides stercoralis infection in adults in Laos and Cambodia: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase 2b/3 trial
  • Viviane P Sprecher, Daniela Hofmann, Vanthanom Savathdy, Phengsavanh Xayavong, Chomseng Norkhankhame, Rekol Huy, Virak Khieu, Somphou Sayasone, Jan Hattendorf, Jennifer Keiser
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Prevention and post-exposure management of occupational exposure to Ebola virus
  • Michael A Moso, Chuan K Lim, Eloise Williams, Caroline Marshall, James McCarthy, Deborah A Williamson

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.