Abbonarsi

Nuance and profound impact: Evaluating the effects of the unmet full coma scale in patients with mild subdural hemorrhage - 12/02/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.038 
Shuo-Chi Chien a, Shih-Ching Kang b, Po-Hsun Tu a, Ching-Chang Chen a, Yu-San Tee b, Chien-Hung Liao b, Chi-Cheng Chuang a, 1, , Chih-Yuan Fu b, 1, ⁎⁎
a Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College &University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan 
b Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College & University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan 

Corresponding author.⁎⁎Corresponding author at: Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei Shan Township, Taoyuan, Taiwan.Department of Trauma and Emergency SurgeryChang Gung Memorial HospitalLinkou Medical CenterNo. 5Fu-Hsing StreetKwei Shan TownshipTaoyuanTaiwan

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13–15 are typically categorized as having mild traumatic brain injury. We hypothesize that patients without a maximum GCS score – specifically, patients with GCS scores of 13 and 14 – may exhibit poorer neurological outcomes.

Method

Between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, SDH patients with GCS scores ranging from 13 to 15 were retrospectively studied. We compared outcomes between patients with a maximum GCS score of 15 and those with scores of either 13 or 14. Independent factors associated with neurological deterioration among patients with a GCS score of 15 were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis.

Results

During the study period, 470 patients with SDH and GCS scores between 13 and 15 were examined. Compared to patients with a maximum GCS score (N = 375), those in the GCS 13–14 group (N = 95) showed significantly higher rates of neurological deterioration (33.7% vs. 10.4%, p value <0.001) and neurosurgical interventions (26.3% vs. 16.3%, p value <0.024). Moreover, the GCS 13–14 group had a significantly poorer prognosis than patients with a GCS score of 15 [mortality rate: 7.4% vs. 2.4%, p value <0.017; rate of impaired consciousness at discharge: 21.1% vs. 4.0%, p value <0.001; and rate of neurological disability at discharge: 29.5% vs. 6.9%, p value <0.001]. The MLR analysis revealed that SDH thickness (odds ratio = 1.127, p value = 0.006) was an independent risk factor for neurological disability at discharge in patients with a GCS score of 15.

Conclusion

Among SDH patients with mild TBI, those with GCS scores of 13–14 exhibited poorer neurological outcomes than those with a maximum GCS score. The thickness of the SDH is positively associated with neurological disability in SDH patients with a maximum GCS score.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Mild traumatic brain injury, Full coma scale, Subdural hemorrhage, Thickness


Mappa


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 77

P. 60-65 - marzo 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Involuntary sedation of patients in the emergency department for mental health: A retrospective cohort study
  • Lauren T. Southerland, Cassandra L. Pasadyn, Omar Alnemer, Chase Foy, Sheela Vaswani, Sana Chughtai, Henry W. Young, Katherine B. Brownlowe
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Cash critical care time prices vary substantially by region and hospital ownership: A cross-sectional study
  • Tony Zitek, Jacob S. Alexander, Joseph Bui, Nicole Gonzalez, Eric Scheppke, Samanthalee Obiorah, Christopher Wong, David A. Farcy

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.