Abbonarsi

Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience - 01/05/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.01.019 
James Leung, MBBS a, b, , John French, PhD a, b, James Xu, PhD a, b, Hashim Kachwalla, MBBS c, Krishna Kaddapu, PhD c, Tamer Badie, MBBS c, Christian Mussap, PhD a, b, Rohan Rajaratnam, MBBS a, b, Dominic Leung, PhD a, b, Sidney Lo, MBBS a, Craig Juergens, DMedSc a, b
a Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
b South West Sydney Clinical School, University of NSW, Warwick Farm, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
c Department of Cardiology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Corner of Elizabeth and Goulburn Streets, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, AustraliaDepartment of CardiologyLiverpool HospitalCorner of Elizabeth and Goulburn StreetsLiverpoolNSW2170Australia

Abstract

Background & Aim

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) has been increasingly performed overseas. Initial observations have demonstrated its clinical efficacy and safety with additional potential benefits of more accurate lesion assessment and stent deployment, with reduced radiation exposure to operators and patients. However, data from randomised controlled trials or clinical experience from Australia are lacking.

Methods

This was a single-centre experience of all patients undergoing R-PCI as part of the run-in phase for an upcoming randomised clinical trial (ACTRN12623000480684). All R-PCI procedures were performed using the CorPath GRX robot (Corindus Vascular Robotics, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Key inclusion criteria included patients with obstructive coronary disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. Major exclusion criteria included ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock or lesions deemed unsuitable for R-PCI by the operator. Clinical success was defined as residual stenosis <30% without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Technical success was defined as the completion of the R-PCI procedure without unplanned manual conversion. Procedural characteristics were compared between early (cases 1–3) and later (cases 4–21) cases.

Results

Twenty-one (21) patients with a total of 24 lesions were analysed. The mean age of patients was 66.5 years, and 66% of cases were male. Radial access was used in 18 cases (86%). Most lesions were American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology class B2/C (66%). Clinical success was achieved in 100% with manual conversion required in four cases (19%). No procedural complications or in-hospital MACE occurred. Compared to the early cases, later cases had a statistically significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (44.0mins vs 25.2mins, p<0.007), dose area product (967.3 dGy.cm2 vs 361.0dGy.cm2, p=0.01) and air kerma (2484.3mGy vs 797.4mGy, p=0.009) with no difference in contrast usage (136.7mL vs 131.4mL, p=0.88).

Conclusions

We present the first clinical experience of R-PCI in Australia using the Corindus CorPath GRX robot. We achieved clinical success in all patients and technical success in the majority of cases with no procedural complications or in-hospital MACE. With increasing operator and staff experience, cases required shorter fluoroscopy time and less radiation exposure but similar contrast usage.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary artery disease


Mappa


© 2024  The Author(s). Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 33 - N° 4

P. 493-499 - aprile 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The Effect of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on In-Stent Restenosis After Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis
  • Cui Zhao, Kai Hou, Lu Cao, Jixiang Wang
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Self-Apposing Stents in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: A Pilot Study
  • Ahmed Elborae, Mohamed Hassan, Mohammed Abdel Meguid, Karim Bakry, Ahmad Samir, Emmanouil Brilakis, Hossam Kandil, Ahmed ElGuindy

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.