Abbonarsi

Outcome reporting in cardio-obstetrics studies: A systematic review - 10/11/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.008 
Chelsea Hall, MD a, b, c, Anna Shishkina, MD b, e, Robin Thurman, FRANZCOG b, d, Rizwana Ashraf, MD b, e, Ankita Pal, MD b, Daphne Horn f, g, Anish Keepanasseril, MRCPI h, Rohan D'Souza, MD, PhD, FRCOG b, e, i,
a Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
b Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
c Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
d Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia 
e Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada 
f Sidney Liswood Health Sciences Library, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada 
g Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto Canada 
h Department of Obstetrics& Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry, India 
i Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada 

Reprint requests: Rohan D'Souza, MD, PhD, FRCOG, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMcMaster University1280 Main Street WestHamiltonL8S 4L8Canada

ABSTRACT

Background

Although considerable variation in the reporting and definition of outcomes in cardio-obstetrics studies is acknowledged, the extent of this variation has not been documented. The primary objective of this systematic review was to highlight this variation and inform the development of a Core Outcome Set for studies on Cardiac disease in Pregnancy (COSCarP).

Methods

Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central databases were searched from 1980 to 2018 to identify all English-language publications on pregnancy and heart disease. Title/abstract screening and data extraction which included details on the study, patient population, and all reported outcomes, was performed in duplicate by 2 reviewers. As the aim of the review was to identify variation in outcome reporting, risk-of-bias assessment was not performed. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016038218).

Results

The final analysis included 422 cardio-obstetric studies. Maternal mortality or survival were reported in 232/422 studies, with inconsistency in terms of cause of death (all-cause [n = 65], cardiac [n = 55] or obstetric [n = 10]) or timeframe (ranging from in-hospital mortality [n = 11] to mortality 5 years following pregnancy). In 95/232 (41%) studies, the cause and timeframe were not specified. Similar inconsistencies in reporting and definitions were noted for outcomes such as heart failure (n = 298), perinatal loss (n = 296), fetal growth (n = 221), bleeding (n = 205), arrhythmias (n = 202), preterm birth (n = 191), thromboembolism (n = 153) and hypertensive disorders (n = 122). Functioning / life-impact and adverse effects of treatment were sparingly reported in published cardio-obstetric studies.

Conclusions

This systematic review hopes to create awareness among cardio-obstetrics teams about the inconsistencies in reporting and defining outcomes which makes it difficult to compare studies and perform meta-analyses. COSCarP which is being developed through international consensus between patients and care-providers will provide cardio-obstetrics teams with a minimal set of outcomes to be reported in future cardio-obstetrics studies.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Jerome J. (Jeff) Federspiel, MD, PhD and Sarah Goldstein, MD served as Guest Editors for this manuscript.


© 2025  The Authors. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 278

P. 223-234 - dicembre 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Antihypertensive medication prescription dispensation among pregnant women in the United States: A cohort study
  • Melanie T. Chen, Brandi L. Vollmer, C. Adair Blyler, Natalie A. Cameron, Eliza C. Miller, Yongmei Huang, Alexander M. Friedman, Jason D. Wright, Amelia K. Boehme, Natalie A. Bello

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.