Abbonarsi

Evaluating data sharing statements in leading emergency medicine journals: A mixed methods review - 05/03/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.027 
Faith Hendrickson a, , M.D. Hossain a, Jacob Duncan a, Brody Dennis a, Alex Hagood a, Taylor Gardner a, Eli Oldham a, Eli Paul a, Alicia Ito Ford, Ph.D. a, b, Matt Vassar, Ph.D. a, b
a Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States 
b Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States 

Corresponding author at: Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, 1111 W 17th St., Tulsa, OK 74107, United States.Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences1111 W 17th St.TulsaOK74107United States

Abstract

Background

Emergency medicine remains as the front line of healthcare, providing acute care to a diverse population during urgent and critical moments. Our objective was to systematically quantify the prevalence of data sharing statements (DSS) in high-impact emergency medicine journals and assess their implementation by contacting corresponding authors who indicated data available upon request.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to identify the prevalence and content of data sharing statements in clinical studies published in high impact emergency medicine journals between 2018 and 2023, followed by a hierarchical logistic regression analysis to identify variables impacting the incorporation of data sharing statements into emergency medicine studies. Lastly, we conducted a thematic analysis of the data sharing statements extracted from our included sample to identify prevailing themes.

Results

Of the 875 articles reviewed, only 84 (9.6 %) included DSS. DSS prevalence increased over time, from 2.12 % (4/189) in 2018 to 23.71 % (23/97) in 2023. Studies without listed funding sources were significantly less likely to include DSS (estimate = −2.027, p = 0.000). Articles published by BioMed Central (mean effect = 2.497) were more likely to include DSS compared to other publishers. Our review of the DSS content revealed prevailing themes, such as gatekeeper role and conditional data availability, concerning the oversight and regulation of information and the stipulations for data sharing based on certain criteria.

Conclusion

Our study revealed a lack of adherence to DSS, with a slight improvement recently. Listed funding sources and publishers influence DSS presence, highlighting their policy impacts on open science. Our recommendations include increased funding for data sharing, implementation of FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse of digital assets) principles, and encouraging DSS inclusion as a publication requirement to enhance transparency and reproducibility, improving patient care. Further research needs to address barriers to data sharing and develop sustainable solutions in a dynamic research environment.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Emergency medicine, Data sharing statements, Data sharing, Open science, Reproducibility


Mappa


© 2024  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 89

P. 159-168 - marzo 2025 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • GRADE-based procalcitonin guideline for emergency departments
  • Chien-Chang Lee, Lorenzo Porta, Ye Liu, Pin-Tung Chen, Hung-Hsuan Pan, Yi-Tzu Lee, Kuan-Fu Chen, Ching-Chi Lee, Weide Tsai, Chorng-Kuang How, Philipp Schuetz
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Incidental neutropenia: An emergency medicine focused approach
  • Brit Long, Alex Koyfman

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.